Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;14(5):999. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14050999

Table 5.

Differences in CGI and CGA scores in the treatment-resistant and control groups observed after 12 weeks of treatment.

Treatment-Resistant ASD Subjects (N = 42)
(with Pharmacogenetic Intervention)
Improvement in CGI scores
(basal–final scores)
2.26 ± 1.55
Improvement in CGA scores
(final–basal scores)
20.29 ± 11.85
Control subjects (N = 62)
Improvement in CGI scores
(basal–final scores)
−0.87 ± 9.44
Improvement in CGA scores
(final–basal scores)
6.59 ± 7.76
Non-Responders (N = 21)
(no improvement in CGI or CGA scores)
Improvement in CGI scores
(basal–final scores)
0.10 ± 0.63
Improvement in CGA scores
(final–basal scores)
0.48 ± 2.18
Responders (N = 41)
(Improvement in CGI and CGA scores)
Improvement in CGI scores
(basal-final scores)
1.54 ± 0.588
Improvement in CGA scores
(final-basal scores)
11.74 ± 7.17