Skip to main content
. 2022 May 14;14(10):2066. doi: 10.3390/nu14102066

Table 3.

Systematic reviews finding including diet intervention in reducing GDM.

Systematic Review ID RCTs Number Participant Included in Intervention and Control Group (N/n) Association Measurement I2 (p) Quality (Amstar 2)
Oostdam et al., 2011 [59] 7 449/364 RD −0.05 (−0.10–−0.01) 41 (0.12) Critically low
Madhuvrata et al., 2015 * [23] 3 202/207 OR 0.33 (0.14–0.76) 26 (0.26) Moderate
Rogozińska et al., 2015 [55] 6 725/754 RR 0.67 (0.38–1.15) 52 (0.06) Moderate
Song et al., 2016 [20] 5 1279 ** RR 0.80 (0.58–1.10) - Critically low
Tieu et al., 2017 [25] 11 628/652 RR 0.60 (0.35–1.04) 56 (0.07) High
Bennett et al., 2018 [22] 9 3388 ** RR 0.56 (0.36–0.87) 53 (0.03) Moderate
Lamminpää et al., 2018 [34] 15 N.A. N.A. N.A. Critically low
Guo et al., 2019 [51] 11 2838 ** RR 0.75 (0.59–0.95) N.A. Critically low
Zhang et al., 2020 *** [49] 2 911/937 OR 0.66 (0.52–0.82) 0 (0.85) Critically low

* Population = women at high risk; ** Total sample size; *** Mediterranean diet; N.A. = Not available; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk; N = exposed simple size; n = no exposed simple size; and I2(p) = heterogeneity test (p-value).