Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 27;10(5):220. doi: 10.3390/toxics10050220

Table 2.

Levels of confidence and criteria used for tentative identification.

Level Parameter Criteria
Level 1 Molecular formula (Predicted composition) 1 Full match
∆ mass (ppm) 2 <0.5 ppm
Isotope profile (SFit) 3 >70%
MzCloud Match 4 >70%
MS2 Data 5 Yes
RT (min) Consistent with the predicted RT (min) (±2 min)/analytical standard *
Level 2 Molecular formula (Predicted composition) 1 Full match
∆ mass (ppm) 2 <0.5 ppm
Isotope profile (SFit) 3 50–70%
MzCloud Match 4 50–70%
MS2 Data 5 Yes
RT (min) Consistent with the predicted RT (min) (±2 min)
Level 3 Molecular formula (Predicted composition) 1 Full match
∆ mass (ppm) 2 <0.5 ppm
MS2 Data 5 Yes
Level 4 Molecular formula (Predicted composition) 1 Full match
∆ mass (ppm) 2 <0.5 ppm
MS2 Data 5 No
Predicted substance 6 Name
Level 5 Molecular formula (Predicted composition) 1 Full match
∆ mass (ppm) 2 <0.5 ppm
MS2 Data 5 No
Predicted substance 6 No Name

1 Molecular formula (Predicted composition): Assigned elemental composition coincidence with a proposed substance from databases (ChemSpider, Mass List). 2 Δ mass (ppm): mass error (in ppm). 3 Isotope profile (SFit): match between the experimental isotopic pattern and the theoretical one. 4 MzCloud Match: match between the experimental and the MS2 spectra in the mzCloud library. 5 MS2 data: Match between experimental MS2 spectra and the theoretical one in CD. 6 Predicted substance: Name described in one of the employed databases: mzVault/mzCloud Library/ChemSpider/Mass List. * When analytical standard was available, the RT difference between standard and sample was compared.