Skip to main content
. 2022 May 15;14(10):2072. doi: 10.3390/nu14102072

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the included studies in this meta-analysis.

Study Design Total Case (Controls or Cohort Size) Age Range or Mean Age (SD)/Year Male/Female Type of IBD (CD/UC/IBD-u) MINORS Scores
Alexis C. Prince et al. Non-RCT 88 20–80 26/62 39/38/11 14
Richard B. Gearry et al. Non-RCT 72 18–72 39/33 52/20/0 14
T. Joyce et al. Non-RCT 35 39(NA) 13/22 17/17/1 12
Louise Maagaar et al. Non-RCT 49 19–70 9/40 32/12/5 14
Catherine Croagh et al. Non-RCT 12 35–74 5/7 2/10/0 14
Natalia Pedersen et al. RCT 78(LFD:37 ND:41) LFD:20–70 ND:24–69 LFD:12/32 ND:10/35 * LFD:14/30/0 ND:14/31/0 * -
Giorgia Bodini et al. RCT 51(LFD:26 ND:29) LFD:34–48 ND:44–57 LFD:7/19 ND:12/17 LFD:18/8/0 ND:17/12/0 -
Selina R. Cox et al. RCT 52(LFD:27 ND:25) LFD:33(11) ND:40(13) LFD:10/17 ND:13/12 LFD:14/13/0 ND:12/13/0 * -
Emma P. Halmos et al. # RCT 9(LFD:9 ND:9) 29–41 3/6 9/0/0 -

RCT: randomized controlled trial; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; CD: Crohn’s disease; UC: ulcerative colitis; IBD-u: unknown type of inflammatory bowel disease; NA: not available; LFD: low-FODMAP diet; ND: normal diet. *: baseline characteristics without drops. #: a randomized, controlled cross-over trial, and the experimental and control groups consisted of the same 9 subjects.