Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 30;13(5):730. doi: 10.3390/mi13050730

Table 2.

Immunoaffinity approach integrated with microfluidics technique and nanoplasmonic detections to capture and detect exosomes.

Techniques/Approaches Markers Detected Sample Used and Its Volume Detection Sensitivity (LOD) Yield Throughput of Isolation [µL/min] Advantages Disadvantages Year of Publication
Periodic Au nanohole arrays (nPLEX) chip [82] CD45, CD63, CA125, CA19–9, D2–40, EpCAM, EGFR, HER2, CLDN3, and MUC18 Ascites of 150 µL ~3000 exosomes NA 8.3 Isolation time (~30 min) NA 2014
Microfluidic device with AC-EHD-induced [83] HER2, CD9, PSA Serum of 500 µL ~2760 exosomes/μL NA 4.2 Multiplexed sensing, 3-fold enrichment in detection sensitivity compared to a normal hydrodynamic flow NA 2014
Printed antibody microarray on an Au coated surface (SPRi) [84] CD9, CD41, CD63, CD82, EpCAM, and E-cadherin Cell culture supernatant (CCS) exosomes ~4.87 × 107
exosomes/cm2
NA NA Real-time, label-free, and quantitative method No multiplexity 2014
Au nano-island microfluidic device using LSPR [85,86] HSP 100 µL of MCF7 cell culture media (CCM) exosomes NA NA NA Label-free technique Specific for HSP 2018
Au nanoplasmonic array for LSPR based digitalized detection (LSPRi) [87] CD 63 MCF7 secreted exosomes (1× 105 exosomes/mL) 3 fold NA NA Multiplexed measurements, one exosome can be detected and individually imaged in real-time NA 2018
Nano-ellipsoid arrays integrated with a microfluidic chip using LSPR [88] CD63 Lyophilized exosomes 1 ng/mL NA NA Low-cost, time-saving, and applicable to large areas NA 2019