Skip to main content
. 2022 May 15;11(10):2783. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102783

Table 1.

Study characteristics.

First Author Name Years Study Type Location N Age, Median (Range) Reference
Caffo et al. 2019 retrospective Italy 8 74 (56–95) [21]
Calcagno et al. 2016 prospective France 14 69 (57–82) [22]
Calvani et al. 2019 retrospective Italy 14 75 (56–87) [23]
Dabkara et al. 2018 retrospective India 16 74.5 (59–83) [24]
Derosa et al. 2014 prospective Italy 17 72 (52–79) [25]
Di Desidero et al. 2016 prospective Italy 17 73 (63–86) [26]
Di Lorenzo et al. 2007 prospective Italy 18 67 (46–75) [27]
Dickinson et al. 2012 retrospective UK 21 75 (N/A) [28]
Fontana et al. 2009 prospective Italy 23 74.5 (54–91) [29]
Fontana et al. 2010 retrospective Italy 24 83 (78–92) [19]
Gebbia et al. 2011 prospective Italy 25 72 (56–83) [30]
Glode et al. 2003 retrospective USA 25 72.6 (54–88) [31]
Hatano et al. 2011 retrospective Japan 25 71 (49–90) [32]
Jellvert et al. 2011 prospective Sweden 28 60 (45–75) [33]
Jeong & Lee 2017 prospective Korea 28 71 (49–88) [34]
Knipper et al. 2019 retrospective Germany 28 78 (N/A) [35]
Kubota et al. 2017 prospective Japan 29 74.2 (66–88) [36]
Ladoire et al. 2010 prospective France 32 74 (55–88) [37]
Lord et al. 2007 prospective UK 35 69 (51–86) [38]
Meng et al. 2012 retrospective China 38 72.8 (69–78) [39]
Nelius et al. 2010 prospective USA 39 68 (42–85) [40]
Nicolini et al. 2004 prospective Italy 41 72 (62–84) [41]
Nishimura et al. 2001 prospective Japan 43 70 (50–82) [42]
Noguchi et al. 2016 prospective Japan 49 68.6 (48–80) [43]
Orlandi et al. 2013 retrospective USA 52 81 (52–92) [44]
Tralongo et al. 2016 prospective Italy 57 77 (72–82) [45]
Vorob’ev et al. 2011 retrospective Russia 58 72.8 * (56–85) [46]
Wang et al. 2015 prospective USA 58 76 (50–86) [47]
Wozniak et al. 1993 prospective USA 74 67 (55–78) [48]
Yashi et al. 2014 prospective Japan 37 75 (67.8–79.3) [49]

* = mean; N = sample size, N/A = not available.