Skip to main content
. 2022 May 17;27(10):3216. doi: 10.3390/molecules27103216

Table 2.

Comparative requirements for L. angustifolia essential oil according to the Ph.Eur. (10th Ed.) and ISO 3515:2002.

Studied EOs Analytical Requirements
Component 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year PH-Eur ISO 3515:2002 (Other Origin) a
limonene 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.6 ≤1% ≤1%
1.8-cineoleb 1.0 2.0 0.5 0.6 ≤2.5% ≤3%
β-phellandreneb 0.1 ≤1%
cis-β-ocimene 3.1 4.2 4.0 3.9 1–10%
trans-β-ocimene 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.3 0.5–6%
3-octanone 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.1–5% ≤3%
camphor 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.3 ≤1.2% ≤1.5%
linalool 19.3 23.1 27.6 34.2 20–45% 20–43%
linalool acetate 26.3 21.2 26.0 19.4 25–47% 25–47%
terpinene-4-ol 5.4 15.3 5.7 9.3 0.1–8% ≤8%
lavandulyl acetate 6.1 0.9 10.0 6.1 ≤0.2% ≤8%
lavandulol 0.8 0.8 0.6 ≤0.1% ≤3%
α-terpineol 1.4 4.9 5.6 4.2 ≤2% ≤2%

a The ISO provides different specifications depending on origin. b 1.8-cineole and β-phellandrene can be coeluted. Bold font: Divergence from the PH-Eur and/or ISO 3515:2002; Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia, 10th ed.; Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2020.