Table 4.
Best classifiers in the whole cohort.
| Evaluated comparison | Panel of classifiers | ACC | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| CR + PR vs NR | E-cadherin | 62.61% | 0.027 |
| GHRL | 67.26% | 0.002 | |
| SSTR2 + E-cadherin | 69.95% | 0.001 | |
| CR vs NR | DRD2 long isoform | 69.23% | 0.006 |
| E-cadherin | 73.08% | 0.001 | |
| SSTR2 + E-cadherin + AIP | 75.00% | < 0.001 | |
| SSTR2 + E-cadherin + IN1GHRL | 75.00% | < 0.001 | |
| PR vs NR | SSTR2 + Ki-67 | 67.87% | 0.02 |
| SSTR2 + SSTR5 + ARRB1 | 69.68% | 0.004 | |
| CR vs PR | E-cadherin | 65.84% | 0.028 |
| PEBP1 | 69.68% | 0.004 |
All individual classifiers and those panels with 2 or 3 classifiers that display an improvement in accuracy are presented in this table. ACC: Accuracy.