Skip to main content
. 2022 May 28;22:198. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01783-1

Table 2.

Comparisons of resilience, social support, coping styles, and corresponding norms (N = 431)

Score mean ± SD Norm MDa 95% CIb P
Resilience (N = 560)e
CD-RISCc total score 54.72 ± 14.71 65.4 ± 13.9 − 10.68 − 12.59, − 8.77  < 0.001
Perceived social support (N = 1589)f
MSPSSd total score 65.45 ± 9.40 68.91 ± 11.99 − 3.46 − 4.68, − 2.24  < 0.001
Coping style (N = 701)g
Confrontation 19.87 ± 3.73 19.48 ± 3.81 0.39 − 0.10, 0.87 0.12
Avoidance 16.70 ± 1.90 14.44 ± 2.97 2.25 2.01, 2.50  < 0.001
Resignation 9.57 ± 2.87 8.81 ± 3.17 0.76 0.39, 1.13  < 0.001

aMean difference

bConfidence interval

cConnor–Davidson resilience scale

dMultidimensional scale of perceived social support

eAdapted from: Davidson JRT. Connor–Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) Manual. Unpublished. 08–19-2018, accessible at www.cd-risc.com

fAdapted from: Jiang Q. Perceived social support scale. Chin J Behav Med Sci. 2001; 10(1): 41–43

gAdapted from: Shen X, Jiang Q. Report on application of Chinese version of MCMQ in 701 patients. Chin J Behav Med Sci. 2009; 9(1):18–20