Skip to main content
. 2022 May 28;41:24. doi: 10.1186/s41043-022-00303-z

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup factor Subgroup Studies OR (95% CI) Heterogeneity P
I2
Study design Cross-sectional 9 [19, 2224, 2628, 30, 34] 1.73 (1.53–1.95) 48% 0.02
Cohort 8 [20, 21, 25, 29, 3133, 35] 1.25 (1.16–1.35) 43% 0.06
Effect measure RR 2 [25, 31] 1.33 (1.16–1.51) 32.2% 0.225
HR 3 [29, 32, 35] 1.09 (1.05–1.54) 55.5% 0.081
OR 12 [1924, 2628, 30, 33, 34] 1.30 (1.01–1.76) 86.7% 0.0002
Average age at baseline  < 50 years old 6 [21, 25, 26, 3133] 1.29 (1.10–1.52) 52% 0.04
 ≥ 50 years old 11 [19, 20, 2224, 2730, 34, 35] 1.50 (1.31–1.72) 62% 0.0003
Follow-up period (longitudinal only)  < 10 years 3 [25, 31, 35] 1.29 (1.05–1.58) 54% 0.09
 ≥ 10 years 5 [20, 21, 29, 32, 33] 1.23 (1.12–1.35) 45% 0.08
Sample size  < 10,000 6 [20, 24, 25, 29, 34, 35] 1.30 (1.20–1.41) 40% 0.09
 ≥ 10,000 11 [19, 2123, 2628, 3033] 1.63 (1.35–1.96) 66% 0.0001
Diagnostic method CES-D 7 [20, 21, 26, 30, 31, 33, 35] 1.19 (1.07–1.33) 9.6% 0.351
PHQ-9 3 [22, 24, 34] 1.62 (1.05–2.48) 84.7% 0.001
HADS 2[27, 28] 1.64 (1.30–2.08) 0.0% 0.383
Treated by antidepressants 3 [21, 25, 29] 1.40 (1.24–1.57) 0.0% 0.422
Other methods (Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, GHQ, DASS-21) 4 [19, 23, 32] 1.05 (0.54–2.04) 53% 0.07