Skip to main content
. 2017 May 22;145(12):2530–2535. doi: 10.1017/S095026881700098X

Table 2.

Diagnostic statistics and 95% CI for assessing the diagnostic accuracy of anorectal swabbing: development sample

Parameter Estimate (95% CI)*
Diagnostic odds ratio 636 (534–758)
Sensitivity 87·2 (86·6–87·8)
Specificity 98·9 (98·7–99·1)
Positive predictive value 98·6 (98·3–98·8)
Negative predictive value 90·3 (89·8–90·8)
Positive likelihood ratio 82·1 (69·7–96·8)
Negative likelihood ratio 0·129 (0·123–0·136)
*

Cluster robust standard errors specified.