Table 2.

Assessment of quality of studies [4, 5, 14, 16–28]

Author [ref]	Were patient's demographic characteristics clearly described?	Was the patient's history clearly described and presented as a timeline?	Was the current clinical condition of the patient on presentation clearly described?	Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described?	Were the interventions or treatment procedure clearly described?	Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly described?	Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described?	Does the case report provide takeaway lessons?	Risk of bias
More et al. [14]	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Pawar et al. [16]	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Low
Shaiba et al. [17]	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Borkotoky et al. [5]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Diggikar et al. [18]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Divekar et al. [19]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Diwakar et al. [20]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Eghbalian et al. [21]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Low
Kappanavil et al. [22]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Lima et al. [23]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Magboul et al. [24]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
McCarty et al. [4]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Orlanski-Meyer et al. [25]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Saha et al. [26]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Schoen-makers et al. [27]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low
Shaiba et al. [28]	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Low