TABLE 3.
CAT test results for patients with gliomas of interest.
| CAT Test | Cut-off | A | B | C | |
| Written comprehension | Words Ts | 54 | 50† | 53† | 51† |
| Raw score | 27/30 | 25 | 27 | 26 | |
| Speech production | Reading words Ts | 61 | 69 | 69 | 57† |
| Raw score | 45/48 | 48 | 48 | 42 | |
| Object naming Ts | 61 | 61† | 60† | 61† | |
| Raw score | 43/48 | 42 | 41 | 43 | |
| Repeating complex words Ts | 61 | 62 | 62 | 55† | |
| Raw score | 5/6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | |
| Cognitive | Recognition memory Ts | 47 | 48 | 59 | 32† |
| Raw score | 8/10 | 9 | 10 | 4 | |
Results from the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) are shown for the subtests that were impaired for patients A, B and C. Raw scores are converted to T-scores following comparison to a reference population of 113 patients. If the score is equal or below the cut-off value, this is classified as impaired performance, marked by † in bold. The raw score indicates how many errors the patients made, or in the cut-off column, the total number of points available (denominator), and the highest number associated with impaired performance (numerator). The patients performed in the normal range for the remainder of the subtests from the CAT.