Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;93(6):573–581. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328422

Table 2.

Treatment effects at immediately postintervention and 12-week follow-up in the intention-to-treat population

CIAT Plus M-MAT Usual care CIAT Plus versus usual care M-MAT versus usual care M-MAT versus CIAT Plus
Unadjusted mean change score PIV-Baseline (SD) Unadjusted mean change score PIV-Baseline (SD) Unadjusted mean change score PIV-Baseline (SD) Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) P value Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) P value Adjusted mean difference (95% CI) P value
Primary outcome
Aphasia severity, WAB-R-AQ 0.96 (4.81) 1.04 (5.17) 2.06 (6.56) −1.05 (−2.88 to 0.78) 0.36 −1.06 (−2.89 to 0.78) 0.36 −0.004 (−1.77 to 1.76) 1.00
Key secondary outcomes at post-intervention
Aphasia severity, WAB-R-AQ by severity stratum
 Mild 0.51 (4.56) 1.43 (3.57) 1.11 (5.25) + + 0.93 (−0.71 to 2.56) 0.26
 Moderate 2.35 (5.60) −1.33 (6.54) 4.74 (9.00) + + 3.71 (−6.36 to 1.06) 0.006*
 Severe 0.40 (3.68) 8.35 (7.05) NA (n=0) + + 7.83 (0.87 to 14.80) 0.03*
Functional communication, CETI 2.96 (11.85) 4.29 (10.47) −1.83 (10.15) 4.32 (0.03 to 8.61) 0.048* 4.64 (0.32 to 8.95) 0.032* 0.31 (−3.81 to 4.44) 0.98
Multimodal communication, Scenario Test −0.30 (4.62) 1.83 (5.78) 1.20 (4.39) −1.57 (−3.29 to 0.15) 0.08 0.31 (−1.40 to 2.02) 0.90 1.88 (0.195 to 3.57) 0.0245*
Overall quality of life, SAQOL-39g: Mean Score 0.06 (0.35) 0.17 (0.38) −.02 (0.37) 0.09 (−0.03 to 0.21) 0.17 0.20 (0.08 to 0.31) 0.0004* 0.10 (−0.01 to 0.22) 0.085
Communication-related quality of life, SAQOL-39g: Communication Scale 0.15 (0.64) 0.41 (0.49) −.03 (0.57) 0.20 (0.01 to 0.39) 0.039* 0.43 (0.24 to 0.62) <0.0001* 0.24 (0.05 to 0.42) 0.008*
COMPARE naming battery: 80 treated items 15.61 (11.38) 11.30 (10.95) 3.90 (7.73) 10.73 (7.83 to 13.63) <0.0001* 7.49 (4.58 to 10.41) <0.0001* 3.24 (−6.05 to 0.43) 0.019*
COMPARE naming battery: 100 untreated items 4.09 (9.86) 2.32 (8.95) 0.51 (10.09) 3.64 (0.79 to 6.50) 0.0081* 1.71 (−1.16 to 4.58) 0.3402 −1.93 (−4.71 to 0.84) 0.2281
Key secondary outcomes at 12 week follow-up
Aphasia severity, WAB-R-AQ 0.65 (5.85) 2.0 (5.02) 3.07 (6.58) 2.39 (−4.24 to 0.53) 0.008* −1.15 (−3.01 to 0.71) 0.32 1.24 (−0.56 to 3.04) 0.24
Aphasia severity, WAB-R-AQ by severity stratum
 Mild 0.37 (5.52) 2.38 (3.89) 1.78 (5.84) + + 2.03 (0.38 to 3.67) 0.02*
 Moderate 1.40 (7.03) 0.74 (7.56) 6.54 (7.39) + + −0.64 (−3.42 to 2.13) 0.65
 Severe 2.60 (NA; n=1) 3.00 (3.08) NA (n=0) + + 1.33 (−7.37 to 10.03) 0.76
Functional communication, CETI 2.64 (15.05) 3.83 (16.58) 0.20 (13.31) 2.14 (−2.31 to 6.59) 0.49 2.68 (−1.77 to 7.13) 0.33 0.54 (−3.73, 4.81) 0.95
Multimodal communication, Scenario Test 0.57 (6.10) 1.76 (5.90) 1.45 (6.17) −0.91 (−2.67 to 0.85) 0.45 0.30 (−1.43 to 2.03) 0.91 1.21 (−0.5 to 2.92) 0.22
Overall quality of life, SAQOL-39g: Mean Score −0.02 (0.38) 0.08 (0.35) 0.01 (0.36) −0.03 (−0.15 to 0.10) 0.87 0.07 (−0.05 to 0.19) 0.38 0.09 (−0.25 to 0.211) 0.15
Communication-related quality of life, SAQOL-39g: Communication Scale 0.11 (0.60) 0.17 (0.64) 0.11 (0.67) −0.001 (−0.194 to 0.193) 0.9999 0.036 (−0.157 to 0.229) 0.898 0.037 (−0.151 to 0.225) 0.887
COMPARE naming battery: 80 treated items 9.35 (7.76) 8.61 (8.55) 4.00 (7.80) 4.23 (1.30 to 7.16) 0.002* 4.42 (1.49 to 7.35) 0.001* 0.186 (−2.67 to 3.04) 0.987
COMPARE naming battery: 100 untreated items 3.24 (8.24) 3.46 (9.52) 2.97 (6.76) 0.06 (-2.83 to 2.96) 0.9985 0.26 (-2.64 to 3.16) 0.9753 0.20 9 (2.63 to 3.02) 0.953

NB: Bold and *: Statistically significant difference; +These comparisons were not planned for in our statistical analysis plan.23

CETI, Communication Effectiveness Index; CIAT-Plus, Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy; COMPARE, Constraint-Induced or Multi-Modality Personalised Aphasia Rehabilitation; M-MAT, Multimodality Aphasia Therapy; N/A, not available; PIV, Post-intervention; SAQOL-39g, Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39g; WAB-R-AQ, Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient.