Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Jan 28;17(3):362–372. doi: 10.1177/15562646221075884

Table 4.

Factors associated with knowledge of electronic informed consent

Variables N (%) Median (IQR) a p-value
Total 547 (100) 8 (6–8) N/A
Gender
 Male 264 (48) 8 (5–8) 0.233
 Female 283 (52) 8 (6–8)
Residency
 Urban 455 (83) 8 (6–8) 0.440
 Rural 92 (17) 8 (4–8)
Current job status
 Student 92 (17) 8 (5–8) 0.323
 Unemployed 36 (6) 7 (1–8)
 Part-time employment 53 (10) 8 (6–8)
 Full-time employment 366 (67) 8 (5–8)
Annual per capita household disposable income level
 Low (<7400 CNY) 115 (21) 8 (3–8) 0.278
 Lower-middle (7400 – 16000 CNY) 85 (16) 8 (5–8)
 Middle (16000 – 25000 CNY) 128 (23) 8 (6–8)
 Upper-middle (25000 – 39000 CNY) 124 (23) 8 (6–8)
 High (39000 – 75000 CNY) 95 (17) 8 (7–8)
Level of education
 Less than high school 36 (7) 5 (0–8) 0.000*
 High school 148 (27) 8 (5–8)
 College 269 (49) 8 (6–8)
 Postgraduate 94 (17) 8 (7–8)
Previously participated in a clinical trial
 Yes 170 (31) 8 (6–8) 0.192
 No 377 (69) 8 (6–8)
Awareness of electronic informed consent
 Never heard of it 237 (43) 7 (4–8) 0.000*
 Heard of it but not very familiar 219 (40) 8 (7–8)
 Heard of it and familiar 91 (17) 8 (8–8)
Preferred device to use for electronic informed consent
 Mobile device (mobile phone/tablet) 476 (87) 8 (6–8) 0.293
 PC device (desktop computer) 71 (13) 8 (6–8)
a

Mann-whitney test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used

*

Statistically significant

IQR = Interquartile range