Skip to main content
. 2022 May 16;9:863470. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.863470

TABLE 1.

Comparison of the predicted fluxes of a chemostat experiment at a dilution rate of 0.4 h−1 with the experimental flux distribution of Heyland et al. (2009). Upt, uptake; UGlc, upper glycolysis; LGlc, lower glycolysis; Ferm, fermentation; Esnk, electron sink/glycerol pathway; Resp, respiration; Trsn, trehalose synthesis; Trdg, trehalose degradation; Grwt, growth.

Upt Uglc LGlc Ferm Esnk Resp Trsn Trdg Grwt
Predicted flux (mol/Cmolx/h) 0.504 0.4669 0.8251 0.7391 0.0898 0.0719 0.0072 0.0072 0.4
Experimental flux (mol/Cmolx/h) 0.4753 0.4373 0.8745 0.7272 0.0428 0.0808 0.0051 0.0041 0.4
Deviation +6% +7% -6% +2% +110% -11% +41% +76% 0%