Skip to main content
. 2022 May 16;13:872701. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.872701

Table 2.

Human studies comparing frequency measurements of slow wave CBF and CSF oscillations using MRI imaging (upper) vs. analysis of TCD derived CBF, and ICP pressure measured oscillations (lower) cpm, cycles per min; Hz, cycles per sec.

Author Method CBF frequency range CBF frequency peak mean CSF EEG
Horowitz et al. (8) MRI Bold (sleep) 0.01–0.03 Hz, 0.6–1.8 cpm 0.02–0.03 Hz
1.2–1.8 cpm
No Yes
Fukunaga et al. (7) MRI Bold (sleep) 0.01–0.05 Hz 0.6–3 cpm No Yes
Raichle and Snyder (9)
MRI Bold (resting)
Not given Approx 2–3 cpm No No
Fultz et al. (2)
MRI Bold and CSF
(sleep)
Not given d/dt max=0.05 Hz or “about” 3 cpm 0.05 Hz or 3 cpm in 4th ventricle (peak) Yes
Kiviniemi et al. (4)
MRI Bold, (anesthesia)
0.025–0.041
Hz 1.5–2.5 cpm
0.033 Hz
2.0 cpm
No
Kiviniemi et al. (6) MRI Bold (sedation) 0.02–0.06
Hz 1.2–3.6 cpm
No
Kiviniemi et al. (5)
MRI CSF pulsations in brain parenchyma
Total range
LF= low frequency
VLF= very low frequency
1.64.4 (cpm) 0.010.073 Hz 1.6–4.4 (cpm) 0.027–0.073 Hz 0.61 = 1.6 (cpm) 0.01–0.027 Hz
Current findings TCD and ICP (head injury) 0.011–0.038 Hz 0.6–2.3 cpm Mean= 0.0245 Hz, 1.5 cpm ICP monitoring No
Spiegelberg et al. (18) TCD and ICP (review) 0.0055–0.05 Hz 0.33–3 cpm ICP monitoring No
Martinez-Tejada, et al. (19) TCD and ICP (review) 0.003–0.067 Hz 0.2-4 cpm ICP monitoring No