Table 2.
Comparison of different body fluid samples.
Body fluid type | Main biopsy components | Advantage | Challenge |
---|---|---|---|
Blood | CTC, ctDNA, exosome | Mature analysis method. Tumor progression can be monitored in real-time. For the most frequent patients. It is used more commonly and widely used | High false negative rate. Low biomarker quality and quantity. Biomarkers have a shorter half-life. Can’t collect continuously |
Urine | CTC,ctDNA, Urine-mRNA, exosome | The sample size is large. Non-invasive, and can be collected continuously. Suitable for longitudinal follow-up. There was a higher response to the tumor metastasis | The collection process is susceptible to contamination. The number was decreased after kidney filtration |
Saliva | Saliva-mRNA, miRNA | Non-invasive operation. Low risk of cross-contamination. Lung cancer progression can be monitored in real-time. | Sample size is less. Low biomarker quality and quantity. Complex components, including enzymes, antibodies, hormones, etc |
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid | Tumor cell BALF-mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA, exosome | Non-invasive operation. Early-stage central lung cancer has a high sensitivity and specificity. Intratumoral heterogeneity. The sample size is large | Sample size is less. Lack of mature sampling methods |
Pleural effusion | CTC, ctDNA, PE-mRNA | High quality and quantity of the biomarkers. Highly correlated with the clinical characteristics | Invasive operation. Lung cancer progression cannot be monitored in real-time. Early-stage patients are not applicable |