Skip to main content
. 2022 May 16;13:864434. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.864434

Table 3.

Outcomes of comparison of the bacterial composition of PS and US samples.

Order log2_median_ratio Median_diff Mean_diff p -value
Caulobacterales PS US Inf 0.00772 0.00761 0.00079
Gemmatales PS US −2.00000 −0.02317 −0.02512 0.00121
Ktedonobacterales PS US 5.45943 0.04151 0.03668 0.00193
Opitutales PS US 1.21150 0.02413 0.02134 0.00205
Sphingomonadales PS US 0.42257 0.06274 0.06513 0.00282
Pedosphaerales PS US 1.41009 0.11680 0.10819 0.00451
Saccharimonadales PS US Inf 0.00772 0.00705 0.00573
Nitrososphaerales PS US –Inf −0.04826 −0.03939 0.01428
Chloroflexales PS US 1.53051 0.01641 0.01389 0.01550
Pirellulales PS US −1.09954 −0.01544 −0.01389 0.01811
Lactobacillales PS US Inf 0.00193 0.00172 0.01932
Fimbriimonadales PS US –Inf −0.00483 −0.00445 0.02170
Phycisphaerales PS US –Inf −0.00386 −0.00464 0.04036
Sphingobacteriales PS US Inf 0.00386 0.00413 0.04457
Steroidobacterales PS US 0.00000 0.00000 0.00257 0.04483
Rokubacteriales PS US 2.00000 0.00869 0.00517 0.04621
Gaiellales PS US 0.41504 0.00965 0.00839 0.04689

Orders differentially present were reported, along with log2 median ratio between the two conditions, the median and mean difference, and the p-value of the Wilcoxon test applied to assess the significance of the difference. Significant p-value are in bold.