TABLE 3.
The classification performance comparison of the five methods.
| Group | Methods | ACC (%) ± SD | SEN (%) ± SD | SPE (%) ± SD | GMean (%) ± SD | F1 (%) ± SD |
| AD-HC | Lasso + SVM | 85.45 ± 1.10 | 75.34 ± 2.87 | 91.89 ± 0.81 | 83.19 ± 1.49 | 80.05 ± 1.66 |
| GroupLasso + SVM | 86.16 ± 0.78 | 77.13 ± 1.73 | 91.97 ± 1.00 | 84.24 ± 0.93 | 80.75 ± 2.75 | |
| ElasticNet + SVM | 84.56 ± 1.00 | 74.90 ± 2.14 | 90.72 ± 1.24 | 82.41 ± 1.13 | 79.04 ± 1.24 | |
| Sparse Group Lasso + SVM |
85.75 ± 0.83 | 75.99 ± 2.29 | 92.20 ± 0.88 | 83.69 ± 1.11 | 80.89 ± 1.18 | |
| Multi-modal LassoNet |
90.68 ± 0.34 | 88.81 ± 0.68 | 91.91 ± 0.55 | 90.34 ± 0.36 | 88.25 ± 0.52 | |
| AD-EMCI | Lasso + SVM | 75.88 ± 0.58 | 93.06 ± 0.87 | 54.22 ± 0.95 | 71.03 ± 0.61 | 81.15 ± 0.56 |
| GroupLasso + SVM | 75.92 ± 1.04 | 93.12 ± 0.63 | 54.33 ± 1.77 | 71.12 ± 1.14 | 81.16 ± 0.87 | |
| ElasticNet + SVM | 76.13 ± 0.61 | 92.91 ± 0.94 | 54.98 ± 1.96 | 71.45 ± 1.01 | 81.27 ± 0.60 | |
| Sparse Group Lasso + SVM |
70.23 ± 0.63 | 90.44 ± 1.05 | 44.69 ± 1.82 | 63.56 ± 1.04 | 77.05 ± 0.67 | |
| Multi-modal LassoNet |
83.63 ± 0.74 | 87.32 ± 1.22 | 79.00 ± 1.33 | 83.05 ± 0.76 | 85.70 ± 0.84 | |
| EMCI-HC | Lasso + SVM | 67.04 ± 0.69 | 78.67 ± 1.98 | 57.61 ± 1.49 | 67.30 ± 0.68 | 68.12 ± 0.90 |
| GroupLasso + SVM | 84.42 ± 0.65 | 96.62 ± 0.65 | 74.43 ± 0.98 | 84.80 ± 0.52 | 84.08 ± 0.57 | |
| ElasticNet + SVM | 83.76 ± 0.42 | 94.69 ± 0.69 | 74.72 ± 0.92 | 84.11 ± 0.44 | 84.07 ± 0.41 | |
| Sparse Group Lasso + SVM |
83.20 ± 1.15 | 95.83 ± 0.88 | 72.74 ± 1.43 | 83.49 ± 1.14 | 70.86 ± 1.16 | |
| Multi-modal LassoNet |
88.77 ± 0.70 | 90.87 ± 1.05 | 87.06 ± 0.95 | 88.94 ± 0.69 | 87.92 ± 0.83 |