Skip to main content
. 2022 May 16;9:864098. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.864098

Table 3.

Association between fatty acid patterns and oral cancer risk.

Model# Quartiles of the fatty acid pattern score* Ptrend
I II III IV
“SFA” pattern
Case/control (n) 138/86 139/84 99/125 72/151
Crude 1.0 (reference) 0.97 (0.66, 1.42) 2.06 (1.39, 2.95) 3.36 (2.28, 4.96) <0.001
Model 1 1.0 (reference) 0.93 (0.60, 1.43) 2.24 (1.46, 3.44) 3.00 (1.93, 4.68) <0.001
Model 2 1.0 (reference) 1.07 (0.68–1.68) 2.56 (1.62, 4.02) 3.71 (2.31, 5.94) <0.001
“PUFA” pattern
Case/control (n) 116/107 137/87 111/113 84/139
Crude 1.0 (reference) 0.68 (0.47, 1.00) 1.10 (0.76, 1.59) 1.79 (1.23.2.62) <0.001
Model 1 1.0 (reference) 0.58 (0.38, 0.89) 0.99 (0.65, 1.15) 1.59 (1.04, 2.44) 0.006
Model 2 1.0 (reference) 0.55 (0.35, 0.85) 0.92 (0.59, 1.42) 1.38 (0.88, 2.16) 0.038
“MUFA” pattern
Case/control (n) 101/123 125/98 119/105 103/120
Crude 1.0 (reference) 0.64 (0.44, 0.94) 0.73 (0.50, 1.05) 0.96 (0.66, 1.39) 0.980
Model 1 1.0 (reference) 0.67 (0.44, 1.03) 0.75 (0.49, 1.14) 1.03 (0.67, 1.56) 0.762
Model 2 1.0 (reference) 0.68 (0.44, 1.06) 0.78 (0.50, 1.20) 1.15 (0.74, 1.78) 0.441
“MLC-FA” pattern
Case/control (n) 111/113 117/106 123/101 97/126
Crude 1.0 (reference) 0.89 (0.61, 1.29) 0.81 (0.56, 1.17) 1.28 (0.88, 1.85) 0.290
Model 1 1.0 (reference) 0.69 (0.45, 1.05) 0.69 (0.45, 1.06) 0.99 (0.65, 1.52) 0.993
Model 2 1.0 (reference) 0.72 (0.46, 1.12) 0.69 (0.45, 1.08) 1.02 (0.66, 1.58) 0.928
*

Four categories were obtained by quartiles of the fatty acid pattern scores. Each participant was assigned a fatty acid pattern score for each pattern.

#

Mode l adjusted for demographic characteristics including sex, age, marital status, residence, BMI, family history of tumor, occupation, education.

Model 2 adjusted for demographic characteristics and tobacco smoking, drinking, oral hygiene score.