Table 2.
Salmonella serovars identified from each sample type
| Serovar | Caecal contents | Rectal swabs | Carcass swabs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of positive samples | % of all positive samples (n = 189) | Prevalence (n = 619) | No. of positive samples | % of all positive samples (n = 150) | Prevalence (n = 625) | No. of positive samples | % of all positive samples (n = 60) | Prevalence (n = 624) | |
| 4,12:i:- | 33 | 17·5% | 5·3% | 18 | 12·0% | 2·9% | 16 | 26·7% | 2·6% |
| 4,5,12:i:- | 32 | 16·9% | 5·2% | 29 | 19·3% | 4·6% | 12 | 20·0% | 1·9% |
| Agona | 2 | 1·1% | 0·3% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Bovismorbificans | 20 | 10·6% | 3·2% | 23 | 15·3% | 3·7% | 5 | 8·3% | 0·8% |
| Choleraesuis var.Kunzendorf | — | — | — | 3 | 2·0% | 0·5% | 1 | 1·7% | 0·2% |
| Derby | 27 | 14·3% | 4·4% | 28 | 18·7% | 4·5% | 8 | 13·3% | 1·3% |
| Dublin | — | — | — | 1 | 0·7% | 0·2% | — | — | — |
| Goldcoast | 3 | 1·6% | 0·5% | 4 | 2·7% | 0·6% | 1 | 1·7% | 0·2% |
| Hindmarsh | 1 | 0·5% | 0·2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Kedougou | 6 | 3·2% | 1·0% | 5 | 3·3% | 0·8% | — | — | — |
| Livingstone | — | — | — | 1 | 0·7% | 0·2% | — | — | — |
| London | 5 | 2·6% | 0·8% | 3 | 2·0% | 0·5% | — | — | — |
| Mbandaka | 1 | 0·5% | 0·2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Newport | — | — | — | 1 | 0·7% | 0·2% | — | — | — |
| Ohio | 1 | 0·5% | 0·2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Panama | 6 | 3·2% | 1·0% | 4 | 2·7% | 0·6% | 1 | 1·7% | 0·2% |
| Reading | 8 | 4·2% | 1·3% | 3 | 2·0% | 0·5% | 1 | 1·7% | 0·2% |
| Rissen | 3 | 1·6% | 0·5% | 4 | 2·7% | 0·6% | 2 | 3·3% | 0·3% |
| Stanley | 5 | 2·6% | 0·8% | 3 | 2·0% | 0·5% | 2 | 3·3% | 0·3% |
| Typhimurium | 36 | 19·0% | 5·8% | 20 | 13·3% | 3·2% | 9 | 15·0% | 1·4% |
| O_ROUGH:i:- | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1·7% | 0·2% |
| O_ROUGH:r:1,5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1·7% | 0·2% |