Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 19;144(10):2144–2153. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816000212

Table 1.

Pooled prevalence of different HIV-1 subtypes stratified by time period, study region and risk group

CRF01_AE CRF07_BC CRF08_BC
Category N Proportion % (95% CI)  P*, I2  P Proportion % (95% CI)  P*, I2  P Proportion % (95% CI)  P*, I2  P
Region 0·001 <0·01 <0·01
 Northeastern 22 57·80 (45·74–69·44) <0·01, 94·0% 4·63 (2·57–7·13) <0·01, 58·2% 0·00 (0·00–0·00) 0·757, 0·0%
 Eastern 115 48·95 (44·17–53·74) <0·01, 95·7% 12·47 (9·84–15·35) <0·01, 93·8% 1·33 (0·64–2·19) <0·01, 85·3%
 Central 27 34·41 (24·75–44·72) <0·01, 94·2% 19·52 (11·78–28·51) <0·01, 94·1% 0·14 (0·00–0·84) 0·004, 46·8%
 Northwestern 7 22·68 (4·31–48·76) <0·01, 96·7% 65·89 (35·98–90·41) <0·01, 97·3% 0·00 (0·00–0·39) 0·153, 36·1%
 Southwestern 45 36·16 (28·16–44·55) <0·01, 96·1% 25·94 (18·20–34·46) <0·01, 96·7% 13·93 (7·93–21·13) <0·01, 96·7%
Time period§ 0·001 <0·01 0·164
 Before 2000 9 29·11 (15·37–44·92) <0·01, 95·5% 0·59 (0·00–3·92) <0·01, 85·3% 0·44 (0·00–3·34) <0·01, 82·8%
 2001–2004 14 28·73 (17·30–41·61) <0·01, 89·8% 6·44 (1·74–13·18) <0·01, 84·2% 6·72 (1·39–14·72) <0·01, 88·1%
 2005–2007 34 33·30 (22·76–44·69) <0·01, 97·5% 10·53 (6·04–15·93) <0·01, 94·0% 4·67 (1·60–8·86) <0·01, 94·1%
 2008–2010 86 49·92 (43·96–55·88) <0·01, 95·6% 15·04 (11·50–18·92) <0·01, 93·8% 2·06 (0·62–4·06) <0·01, 93·8%
 2011–2014 76 48·25 (42·68–53·83) <0·01, 94·9% 26·02 (20·90–31·47) <0·01, 95·6% 1·96 (0·75–3·57) <0·01, 91·4%
Risk group|| <0·01 0·083 <0·01
 MSM 121 51·28 (46·15–56·40) <0·01, 96·1% 19·98 (16·17–24·07) <0·01, 95·7% 0·00 (0·00–0·00) 0·577, 0·00%
 HST 76 38·78 (33·08–44·63) <0·01, 95·4% 14·88 (10·96–19·23) <0·01, 95·0% 9·81 (6·44–13·70) <0·01, 95·3%
Total 219 44·54 (40·81–48·30) <0·01, 96·0% 16·45 (13·82–19·25) <0·01, 95·5% 2·55(1·56–3·73) <0·01, 93·3%

N, Number of estimates; CI, confidence interval; MSM, men who have sex with men; HST, heterosexual transmission.

*

P value was calculated by examining Cochran's Q statistic (P < 0·1 was considered statistically significant).

P value stand for the differences between groups (P < 0·05 was considered statistically significant).

For time period subgroup analysis, 219 datasets from 129 articles were used.

§

For study region subgroup analysis, 216 datasets from 126 articles were used.

||

For risk group subgroup analysis, 197 datasets from 120 articles were used.

#

Others included unique recombinant forms (URFs) and other subtypes.