Table 3.
Variable | Log-odds of cross-speaker CS |
Log-odds of intrasentential CS |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | SE | χ2 | p | Estimate | SE | χ2 | p | |
Intercept | −3.97 | 0.71 | 0.010 | 0.31 | ||||
Age in years (centered) | −0.47 | 0.24 | 3.99 | .046 | −0.41 | 0.23 | 3.23 | .072 |
Level of maternal edu. (centered) | −0.59 | 0.17 | 16.79 | < .001 | −0.15 | 0.12 | 1.47 | .225 |
Group (TLD vs. DLD) | 2.82 | 0.72 | 19.88 | < .001 | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.40 | .525 |
Context (single vs. dual) | 0.95 | 0.42 | 5.57 | .018 | −0.41 | 0.32 | 1.63 | .202 |
Partner language (Span vs. Eng) | 1.71 | 0.59 | 10.35 | < .001 | −1.93 | 0.37 | 35.38 | < .001 |
Language × Group | −3.49 | 0.93 | 17.21 | < .001 |
Note. Bold shows significant predictors based on a likelihood ratio test. The reference categories for dichotomous variables were TLD (for group), single language (for context), and Spanish (for partner language). The text describes effects when changing the reference category for group and for partner language. edu. = education; TLD = typical language development; DLD = developmental language disorder; Span = Spanish; Eng = English.