Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 22;143(13):2766–2776. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003501

Table 1.

Household characteristics and water-related exposures of persons in counties affected by water service interruptions, Alabama, 2010 (N = 470)

N (%)*
Household size, mean (95% CI) 2·8 (2·6–2·9)
Household includes children aged <5 yr 67 (13·4)
Household includes seniors aged ⩾65 yr 136 (29·2)
Dwelling type
House 294 (65·9)
Mobile home 130 (22·6)
Apartment 46 (11·6)
Normally drink tap water 340 (70·2)
Household has a private well 18 (3·3)
Water service during emergency of January, 2010
Water service interruption
Loss of service and loss of pressure 185 (31·1)
Loss of service only 57 (10·4)
Loss of pressure only 102 (22·7)
No loss of service or pressure 126 (35·9)
Loss of service
Median, days (range) 1 (0–30)
None 229 (59·0)
<7 days 130 (23·4)
⩾7 days 111 (17·7)
Loss of pressure
Median, days (range) 1 (0–45)
None 183 (47·0)
1–2 days 146 (28·7)
3–6 days 83 (15·3)
⩾7 days 53 (8·9)
Experienced burst pipes 124 (23·3)
Tap water access and use
Unaffected household (did not report low pressure or service interruption) 126 (35·9)
Affected household, non-potable use of tap water only 49 (9·3)
Affected household, used boiled tap water for potable purposes 25 (4·4)
Affected household, use unboiled tap water for potable purposes 109 (23·2)
Did not report obtaining tap water 161 (27·2)

CI, Confidence interval.

*

Estimates are weighted by inverse of sampling probability, adjusted for non-response.

Potable purposes defined as drinking, cooking, brushing teeth, or preparing infant formula; regardless of treatment. Some category totals do not equal 100% due to rounding.