Skip to main content
. 2013 May 10;142(2):314–326. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813001076

Table 4.

Association between diarrhoea related practice of participating physician (N = 264) and other factors

Physician and their patient-related factors Category Considering severity as the most important factor for prescribing antibiotic Prescribing antibiotic to each of the diarrhoea patients Prescribing antibiotic to each of the cholera patients Advising laboratory test of stool to each diarrhoea patients
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Gender Male
Female 1·26 (0·42–3·79) 0·687 0·38 (0·14–1·02) 0·055 1·07 (0·35–3·33) 0·902 0·88 (0·36–2·15) 0·779
Qualification None
AM 1·82 (0·88–3·74) 0·105 1·91 (0·92–3·94) 0·081 1·50 (0·59–3·80) 0·398 5·77 (2·75–12·14) <0·001
MBBS 2·69 (1·20–6·06) 0·017 0·30 (0·14–0·63) 0·002 0·72 (0·30–1·75) 0·471 1·41 (0·68–2·94) 0·361
Postgraduate 4·23 (1·63–10·97) 0·003 0·20 (0·09–0·46) <0·001 0·56 (0·23–1·36) 0·199 2·93 (1·35–6·34) 0·006
Type of physician based on attachment Pharmacist
None 17·95 (2·12–152·02) 0·008 0·29 (0·08–0·98) 0·047 5·33 (0·61–46·85) 0·131 0·70 (0·21–2·37) 0·567
Private sector 4·00 (1·91–8·38) <.001 0·51 (0·23–1·11) 0·089 1·25 (0·52–2·97) 0·620 1·87 (0·88–3·98) 0·103
Govt. sector 16·84 (1·98–143·26) 0·010 0·24 (0·07–0·86) 0·029 2·33 (0·43–12·57) 0·324 1·29 (0·39–4·28) 0·682
Years of practice <1 yr
1–4 yr 0·65 (0·05–7·88) 0·736 8·00 (0·69–92·70) 0·096 2·67 (0·18–39·63) 0·476 6·00 (0·51–70·67) 0·155
5–9 yr 0·58 (0·05–6·13) 0·648 2·40 (0·31–18·65) 0·403 3·07 (0·27–35·33) 0·369 3·96 (0·39–40·65) 0·248
>10 yr 1·27 (0·12–12·91) 0·843 0·66 (0·09–4·79) 0·682 1·08 (0·11–10·66) 0·947 3·59 (0·37–35·10) 0·273
Average age group of patients treated 0–5 yr
5–15 yr 0·91 (0·42–1·98) 0·808 0·72 (0·36–1·45) 0·358 0·78 (0·35–1·72) 0·532 0·96 (0·48–1·90) 0·895
⩾15 yr 1·04 (0·54–1·99) 0·906 1·78 (1·02–3·11) 0·042 1·29 (0·64–2·59) 0·482 0·72 (0·41–1·26) 0·249
Average socioeconomic status of patients treated Very low
Low 1·69 (0·77–3·69) 0·191 1·21 (0·60–2·46) 0·596 0·73 (0·28–1·90) 0·523 0·63 (0·30–1·32) 0·221
Middle 1·23 (0·52–2·93) 0·635 0·57 (0·25–1·27) 0·168 0·68 (0·24–1·92) 0·460 0·54 (0·24–1·22) 0·135
Average knowledge of patients treated Very low
Low 0·77 (0·38–1·56) 0·464 1·63 (0·90–2·92) 0·105 0·89 (0·43–1·85) 0·746 0·76 (0·42–1·36) 0·353
Good 0·89 (0·34–2·33) 0·809 0·75 (0·33–1·70) 0·487 1·08 (0·38–3·02) 0·890 1·26 (0·55–2·86) 0·589
Average dehydration of patients treated Severe
Some 0·87 (0·36–2·10) 0·762 2·17 (1·01–4·70) 0·049 1·77 (0·73–4·28) 0·206 1·38 (0·65–2·94) 0·399
Mild/no 1·22 (0·48–3·11) 0·674 1·15 (0·51–2·56) 0·741 1·25 (0·51–3·09) 0·626 1·59 (0·72–3·49) 0·251

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; AM, alternative medicine/equivalent quack practitioners' training in India; MBBS, medical graduation qualification in India.

Bold values indicate associations for which corresponding P values are <0·05.

–, Indicates reference group.