Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 24;142(11):2314–2325. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813003300

Table 3.

Probability of detecting true resistance and true non-resistance in bacterial isolates using broth microdilution and disk diffusion susceptibility testing

Non-type-specific E. coli M. haemolytica
Ampicillin (n = 2279) Ceftiofur (n = 2295) Streptomycin (n = 2302) Sulfisoxazole (n = 2316) Tetracycline (n = 2238) TMP-SMX (n = 2308) Ampicillin (n = 783) Tetracycline (n = 783)
Probability of detecting true resistance (sensitivity)*
 Disk diffusion (95% PI) 84·3% 37·1% 70·6% 93·9% 94·9% 81·9% 34·9% 59·9%
(59·4–98·9) (4·8–94·1) (52·1–79·7) (84·5–98·5) (89·7–96·9) (49·1–98·7) (9·6–88·0) (34·1–91·4)
 Broth microdilution (95% PI) 94·7% 79·4% 87·3% 96·1% 92·6% 81·5% 79·4% 89·6%
(76·7–99·1) (45·7–96·4) (65·5–93·8) (88·1–98·7) (87·8–94·7) (58·8–95·9) (39·4–96·1) (57·8–98·3)
 Probability that sensitivity A > B 0·90 0·88 0·99 0·83 0·97 0·49 0·64 0·15
Probability of detecting true non-resistance (specificity)
 Disk diffusion (95% PI) 99·9% 99·9% 99·7% 99·7% 98·0% 99·9% 99·7% 99·8%
(99·5–99·9) (99·8–99·9) (98·7–99·9) (98·8–99·9) (94·8–99·4) (99·7–100·0) (98·9–99·9) (98·8–99·9)
 Broth microdilution (95% PI) 99·1% 99·6% 97·9% 98·7% 96·3% 99·8% 98·5% 98·3%
(98·3–99·8) (99·3–99·9) (96·4–99·3) (97·6–99·4) (93·5–97·7) (99·5–99·9) (96·7–99·8) (95·5–99·8)
 Probability that specificity A > B 0·98 0·97 0·99 0·99 0·97 0·83 0·51 0·79

TMP-SMX, Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; PI, probability interval.

*

The probability of classifying isolates as resistant among isolates that are truly resistant.

The probability of classifying isolates as non-resistant (susceptible or intermediate) among isolates that are truly non-resistant.

One-sided probability comparing values for disk diffusion and broth microdilution: A = value that is numerically greater; B = value that is numerically lower.