Skip to main content
. 2022 May 3;96(7):1935–1950. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03299-x

Table 1.

Reasons to combine testsa

Not all possible outcomes of interest are covered in a single test
Different modes of action need to be covered, which may cause the same toxicological effect
In vivo processes usually involve a chain of events while one in vitro test often represents only a single or a few steps of this complex process
Not all classes of test substances are covered (applicability domains)
Not all severity classes of effect are covered
The positive test result is rare (low prevalence) and the number of false-positive results becomes excessive
The gold standard test is too costly or uses too many animals and substances need to be prioritized
The accuracy (human predictivity) is not satisfying and predictivity can be improved
Existing data and evidences from various tests shall be integrated
ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion) information shall be integrated to make an in vivo extrapolation from data

aCompiled and modified from Hartung et al. (2013) and Rovida et al. (2015)