Skip to main content
. 2022 May 30;12:9013. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13145-w

Table 3.

Equation performance in kidney donor dataset (n = 287).

Formula Bias Precision Accuracy
MPE [95%CI] R2 [95% CI] RMSE [95% CI] MAPE [95% CI] P15 [95% CI] P30 [95% CI]
Cockcroft–Gault − 1.66 [− 1.88; − 1.43] 0.64 [0.57; 0.70] 2.57 [2.37; 2.76] 16.5% [15.3–17.7%] 47% [41%; 53%] 90% [86%; 93%]
Ix − 1.08 [− 1.29; − 0.87] 0.70 [0.64; 0.75] 2.10 [1.92; 2.27] 13.1% [12.1–14.2%] 63% [57%; 68%] 97% [95%; 99%]
CRAFT 1 − 0.71 [− 0.91; − 0.51] 0.73 [0.67; 0.78] 1.86 [1.70; 2.01] 12.2%[11.1–13.3%] 70% [65%; 75%] 97% [94%; 99%]
CRAFT 2 − 0.73 [− 0.94; 0.52] 0.69 [0.63; 0.74] 1.97 [1.80; 2.14] 12.7% [11.6–13.8%] 67% [62%; 72%] 95% [93%; 98%]

Confidence intervals were calculated with the combined variance of multiple imputation (10×) and bootstrap (1000×).

MPE mean prediction error (mmol/day), MAPE mean absolute percentage error, RMSE root mean squared error (mmol/day), R2 the R2-value calculated with linear regression, p15/p30 the percentage of points that fall within 15%/30% of the outcome.