Skip to main content
Cambridge Open Access logoLink to Cambridge Open Access
. 2012 Jun 15;141(3):612–617. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812001239

Pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 isolated from a hunted wild alpine ibex

S JOUTSEN 1, E SARNO 2,3, M FREDRIKSSON-AHOMAA 1, N CERNELA 3, R STEPHAN 3,*
PMCID: PMC9151892  PMID: 22697252

SUMMARY

Occurrence of Yersinia spp. in wild ruminants was studied and the strains were characterized to get more information on the epidemiology of enteropathogenic Yersinia in the wildlife. In total, faecal samples of 77 red deer, 60 chamois, 55 roe deer and 27 alpine ibex were collected during 3 months of the hunting season in 2011. The most frequently identified species was Y. enterocolitica found in 13%, 10%, 4% and 2% of roe deer, red deer, alpine ibex and chamois, respectively. Interestingly, one Y. enterocolitica O:3 strain, isolated from an alpine ibex, carried the important virulence genes located on the virulence plasmid (yadA and virF) and in the chromosome (ail, hreP, myfA and ystA). Most of the Y. enterocolitica strains belonged to biotype 1A of which 14 were ystB positive. Further studies are needed to clarify the importance of alpine ibex as a reservoir of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica.

Key words: Characterization, hunted wild ruminants, Yersinia enterocolitica

INTRODUCTION

Yersiniosis is an important zoonotic disease in humans in Europe [1]. Most of the reported cases are caused by Y. enterocolitica. Human enteric yersiniosis is thought to be primarily foodborne [2]. Y. enterocolitica has been shown to be transmitted mainly by pork products and Y. pseudotuberculosis by contaminated fresh produce. In a Y. pseudotuberculosis outbreak in Finland, it was likely that iceberg lettuce were contaminated by irrigation water contaminated with roe deer faeces [3]. In a small study conducted in Germany, raw game (including meat from roe deer, red deer, and chamois) were frequently (38%) contaminated with potentially pathogenic (ail-positive) Y. enterocolitica when studied by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [4].

Wild boars were recently shown to be an important reservoir of enteropathogenic Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis in Switzerland [5]. Yersiniosis due to Y. pseudotuberculosis has also been shown to be a disease of major importance in deer [6, 7]. Moreover, Y. pseudotuberculosis has also been reported to be a common finding in clinically healthy farmed deer weaners in New Zealand [8].

The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis in wild deer, however, has so far been very rarely studied [912]. In these few studies, both species were isolated from faecal samples of animals free from obvious symptoms of disease. However, all Y. enterocolitica strains were considered non-pathogenic, and Y. pseudotuberculosis was very rarely isolated from faecal samples. The aim of this work was to study the occurrence of Yersinia spp. in wild ruminants in Switzerland and to characterize the strains in order to obtain more information on the epidemiology of enteropathogenic Yersinia in the wildlife.

METHODS

Animals

This study was based on investigations carried out during 3 months (September–November) of the hunting season in 2011. The samples originated from shot red deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra), and ibex (Capra ibex). The sampled animals were hunted in the central and eastern part of Switzerland. In total, 219 faecal samples (red deer, roe deer, chamois, ibex) were examined. The faecal samples originated from 77 red deer, 60 chamois, 55 roe deer and 27 alpine ibex. State gamekeepers and hunters collected the samples in the field immediately after shooting and evisceration of the wild ruminants. After opening the large intestine, faecal matter (at least 10 g) was collected from the colon, placed into sterile tubes and stored under refrigeration. For each hunted animal, sex, age, and location of hunting were recorded.

Yersinia detection and identification

About 1 g faecal material was mixed in 10 ml PMB [13, 14]. After 2 weeks of cold enrichment at 4 °C, 10 μl of the enrichment was plated on cefsulodin-irgasan-novobiosin (CIN) agar (Oxoid AG, Switzerland). The CIN plates were incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h. Presumptive positive colonies were subcultured on blood agar and then tested for the urease enzyme. Urease-positive colonies were identified with API 20E and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight (MALDI–TOF) mass spectrometry [15, 16]. One isolate per sample in a total of 20 strains were biotyped and serotyped. The biotype was determined using pyrazinamidase and Tween activity, esculin hydrolysis, indole production, and salicin, xylose and trehalose fermentation and serotyping was performed with slide agglutination using commercial Y. enterocolitica O:1–O:3, O:5, and O:9 antisera (Denka Seiken, Japan).

Further strain characterization

Eight genes were studied by PCR: two virulence genes (yadA, virF) located on the virulence plasmid of the pathogenic Yersinia spp. (pYV) and five virulence genes (ail, ystA, ystB, myfA, hreP) and rfbC for O:3 serotype located in the chromosome [1720]. The DNA was released from bacterial colonies by heating at 97 °C for 10 min, and 1 μl of this liquid was added to 19 μl of the mastermix (iQ™ SYBR Green Supermix; Bio-Rad, USA). The fluorescence intensity of SYBR Green and the melting curve analysis were studied using the CFX96 system (Bio-Rad). A threshold cycle (Ct) under 30 and a specific melting temperature (Tm) indicated a positive result.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial resistance analysis was performed by disk-diffusion test according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2009). Fourteen antimicrobials were tested: ampicillin (10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), cefalothin (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefpodoxim (10 μg), ceftazidim (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1·25/23·75 μg) [16]. The reference strain Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control.

RESUTS AND DISCUSSION

The occurrence of Yersinia spp. varied between 4% and 13% in wild ruminants being highest in roe (13%) and red deer (12%) (Table 1). The most frequently identified species was Y. enterocolitica found in 13%, 10%, 4% and 2% of roe deer, red deer, alpine ibex and chamois, respectively. Surprisingly, no Y. pseudotuberculosis was isolated even though cold enrichment in peptone broth supplemented with 1% mannitol and 0·15% bile salts (PMB), which should be favourable for Y. pseudotuberculosis [21], was used. The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis in wild deer has so far very rarely been studied (Table 2). In Japan, 4% of the deer were shown to shed Y. pseudotuberculosis in faeces [11]. In Norway, the prevalence of Yersinia in wild red deer was clearly lower [12]. One reason for the higher prevalence of Yersinia in our study could be due to the use of a cold enrichment instead of 2 days enrichment at 21 °C. Y. enterocolitica was also the dominant species in Norwegian deer; however, one Y. pseudotuberculosis strain was detected in Norway. In Italy and New Zealand, the prevalence of Yersinia in red deer was clearly higher (Table 2). In the Italian study, most of the strains isolated were Y. kristensenii. One reason for the low isolation rate of Y. kristensenii in our study could be that we used CIN agar and Y. kristensenii grows very slowly. Y. enterocolitica was the dominant species in wild red deer in New Zealand; however, Y. frederiksenii was also frequently identified [9]. In the same study, Y. pseudotuberculosis was sporadically isolated from clinically healthy farmed deer but not from wild deer. One reason for the low prevalence of Y. pseudotuberculosis could be that the carriage status cannot be adequately identified by faecal culture due to either sporadic shedding of this pathogen or due to the localization of this pathogen in the mesenteric or ileocecal lymph nodes [9].

Table 1.

Prevalence of Yersinia spp. in faeces of clinically healthy wild ruminants in Switzerland 2011

Animal species Animals studied, n Yersinia-positive animals, n (%) Yersinia spp. (no. of strains)
Cervus elaphus (red deer) 77 9 (12%) Y. enterocolitica (8)
Y. kristensenii (1)
Rupicapra rupicapra (chamois) 60 3 (5%) Y. enterocolitica (1)
Y. kristensenii (1)
Yersinia sp. (1)
Capreolus capreolus (roe deer) 55 7 (13%) Y. enterocolitica (7)
Capra ibex (alpine ibex) 27 1 (4%) Y. enterocolitica (1)
All species 219 20 (9%) Y. enterocolitica (17)
Y. kristensenii (2)
Yersinia sp. (1)

Table 2.

Prevalence of Yersinia spp. in faeces of clinically healthy wild deer

Country Animal species Animals studied, n Yersinia-positive animals, n (%) Identified Yersinia spp. (no. of strains) Ref.
Italy Red deer 60 14 (23%) Y. kristensenii (13) [10]
Y. enterocolitica (1)
Roe deer 13 1 (8%)
Chamois 7 0
Japan Sika deer 215 8 (4%) Y. pseudotuberculosis (8) [11]
New Zealand Red deer 83 26 (31%) Y. enterocolitica (13) [9]
Y. kristensenii (1)
Y. intermedia (1)
Y. frederiksenii (11)
White-tailed deer 40 3 (8%) Y. enterocolitica (2)
Y. frederiksenii (1)
Norway Red deer 170 10 (6%) Y. enterocolitica (13) [12]
Y. mollaretii (1)
Y. pseudotuberculosis (1)

The Yersinia spp. strains were identified with MALDI–TOF, API 20E and biotyped (Table 3). Only one of the 20 strains (strain no. 20) could not be identified at species level by MALDI–TOF. By API 20E this strain was identified as Y. frederiksenii/intermedia with an ID% of 98·5%. The biotype remained unknown for three Y. enterocolitica strains (strain nos. 15–17) by MALDI–TOF. One of the Y. enterocolitica strains (strain no. 17) was regarded as potentially pathogenic because it was pyrazinamidase, esculin and salicin negative. However, it was impossible to clearly differentiate if this strain belongs to biotype 3 or 5. This strain was xylose positive and trehalose negative. A typical strain of biotype 3 should be xylose and trehalose positive, and a typical biotype 5 strain should be xylose and trehalose negative [22]. This strain was also sorbitol negative. Y. enterocolitica strains are typically sorbitol positive and Y. pseudotuberculosis strains sorbitol negative.

Table 3.

Identification and characterisation of the Yersinia strains isolated from wild ruminants free from obvious symptoms of disease

Strain no. MALDI–TOF MS API 20E Bio-type Serotype Presence of the virulence genes
Profile ID (%) ail, ystA yadA, virF ystB myfA, hreP
1–6 Y. enterocolitica, 1A 1 155 723 98·3 1A O:5 + V
7–9 Y. enterocolitica, 1A 1 155 723 98·3 1A O:8 + V
10–14 Y. enterocolitica, 1A 1 155 723 98·3 1A NT + V
15–16 Y. enterocolitica, NT 1 155 723 98·3 1A NT
17 Y. enterocolitica, NT 1 114 321 99·6 3 or 5 O:(1,2,)3 + +
18–19 Y. kristensenii 1 114 503 89·2 NT NT V
20 Yersinia sp. 1 155 733 98·5* NT NT

MALDI–TOF MS, Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry; NT, biotype not typable; V, the genes were detected in some strains.

*

ID for Y. frederiksenii/intermedia.

Most (2/17) of the Y. enterocolitica strains from wild ruminants belonged to biotype 1A. The majority of the Y. enterocolitica strains isolated from food and the environment belong to this biotype and these strains are generally regarded as non-pathogenic because the prerequisite virulence genes are missing [6, 23]. Further, in this study, the most important virulence genes (ail, yadA, virF) are missing in biotype 1A strains (Table 3). All the 14 strains identified as Y. enterocolitica 1A by MALDI–TOF carried the ystB gene. Some evidence indicates that YstB plays a role in the pathogenesis caused by Y. enterocolitica 1A [23]. Five of the ystB-positive strains also carried hreP. Two ystB-positive strains were also positive for myfA. Both hreP and myfA have sporadically been identified in ystB-positive Y. enterocolitica 1A strains. However, the impact of hreP and myfA in virulence of biotype 1A strains remains unclear [23]. Some of the 1A strains were identified as serotype O:5 or O:8, which are both associated with human disease; however, the role of these O antigens in virulence of this biotype also remains unclear [23].

One Y. enterocolitica strain (strain no. 17) that harboured all the important virulence genes was isolated from faeces of a clinically healthy wild alpine ibex (Capra ibex) (Table 3). This strain carries the virulence genes yadA and virF located on the pYV, and ail, ystA, hreP and myfA located in the chromosome. It was identified as serotype O:3 strain with commercial antiserum and PCR targeting the rfbC. Furthermore, it agglutinated very weakly with O:1 and O:2 antisera. This pathogenic Y. enterocolitica belongs either to biotype 3 or biotype 5. Similar to goats, ibex belong to the genus Capra and Y. enterocoliticabelonging to biotype 5 and serotype O:2,3 has already been isolated from goats in New Zealand [24]. This bioserotype has frequently been associated with Y. enterocolitica infections in goat flocks. Young animals, in particular, have been shown to be susceptible to this infection. Y. enterocolitica 5/O:2,3 has also been isolated from young emaciated goat and sheep with diarrhoea in Australia [25]. In Europe, bioserotype 5/O:2,3 is reported to be host restricted to hares and thus is known as ‘hare type’ [26]. Interestingly, Y. enterocolitica belonging to biotype 3 and serotype O:1,2,3 has been isolated from chinchillas with lesions associated with pseudotuberculosis in Europe and North America [27]. This type has been assigned as ‘chinchilla type’.

All strains were susceptible to ceftazidim, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. They were resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and cefalothin due to the β-lactamase. Intermediate sensitivity occurred sporadically to cefoxitin, cefpodoxim, cefuroxime, kanamycin and streptomycin (Table 4). No multidrug-resistant strain was detected. The resistance patterns of biotype 1A strains of wild ruminants differed slightly from the patterns of human strains belonging to biotype 1A in Switzerland. The human strains were more frequently resistant to cefoxitin and cefpodoxim and some of them were resistant to kanamycin and nalidixic acid [16].

Table 4.

Antimicrobial resistance patterns in Yersinia strains isolated from wild game

Antimicrobial agent* Number of strains
YE 1A (16) YE 5 (1) YK (2) Y sp. (1)
I R I R I R I R
Ampicillin 0 16 0 1 1 1 0 1
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 0 16 1 0 2 0 0 1
Cefalothin 0 16 0 1 0 2 0 1
Cefoxitin 8 6 0 0 0 0 1 0
Cefpodoxim 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0
Cefuroxime 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Kanamycin 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Streptomycin 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

YE, Y. Enterocolitica; YK, Y. kristensenii; Y sp., Yersinia species; I, intermediate; R, resistant.

*

only antibiotics where intermediate and resistant strains were found are listed.

Number of strains studied.

To summarize, clinically healthy wild ruminants are shedding Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A in their faeces. An untypical Y. enterocolitica O:3 strain carrying the most important virulence genes was isolated from a clinically healthy alpine ibex. More studies are needed to clarify the importance of alpine ibex as a reservoir of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica and the significance of this untypical strain in human and animal infections.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank D. Ziegler and V. Pflüger, Mabritec AG, Riehen, Switzerland for their assistance with the MALDI TOF experiments and the hunters for their help with collecting the samples.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anon. The European Union summary report. Trends and sources of zoonoses and zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2009. EFSA Journal 2011; 9: 2090–2468. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Laukkanen-Ninios R, Fredriksson-Ahomaa M. Epidemiology, virulence genes, and reservoirs of enteropathogenic Yersinia species. In: Fraque SM, ed. Foodborne and Waterborne Bacterial Pathogens: Epidemiology, Evolution and Molecular Biology. Norfolk, UK: Caister Academic Press, 2012, pp. 269–287. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nuorti JP, et al. A widespread outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis O:3 infection from iceberg lettuce. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2004; 189: 766–774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bucher M, et al. Epidemiological data on pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in Southern Germany during 2000–2006. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2008; 5: 273–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fredriksson-Ahomaa M, et al. Prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in wild boars in Switzerland. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2009; 135: 199–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang S, et al. Fatal yersiniosis in farmed deer caused by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 encoding a mannosyltransferase-like protein WbyK. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2008; 20: 356–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sanford S. Outbreaks of yersiniosis caused by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in farmed cervids. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 1995; 7: 78–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hodges R, Carman M, Woods E. Yersinia pseudo tuberculosis recovered from the feces of clinically healthy deer. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 1984; 32: 79–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Henderson T. The isolation of Yersinia sp. from feral and farmed deer feces. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 1984; 32: 88–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pagano A, et al. Feacal bacteria of wild ruminants and the alpine marmot. Veterinary Research Communications 1985; 9: 227–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fukushima H, Gomyoda M. Intestinal carriage of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis by wild birds and mammals in Japan. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1991; 57: 1152–1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aschfalk A, et al. Prevalence of Yersinia species in healthy free-ranging red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Norway. Veterinary Record 2008; 163: 27–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martínez PO, et al. Variation in the prevalence of enteropathogenic Yersinia in slaughter pigs from Belgium, Italy, and Spain. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2011; 8: 445–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fukushima H, Gomyoda M, Kaneko S. Mice and moles inhabiting mountainous areas of Shimane Peninsula as sources of infection with Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990; 28: 2448–2455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stephan R, et al. Rapid species specific identification and subtyping of Yersinia enterocolitica by MALDI–TOF mass spectrometry. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2011; 87: 150–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fredriksson-Ahomaa M, et al. Yersinia enterocolitica strains associated with human infections in Switzerland 2001–2010. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published online: 10 November 2011. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1476-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bhagat N, Virdi JS. Distribution of virulence-associated genes in Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1A correlates with clonal groups and not the source of isolation. FEMS Microbiological Letters 2007; 266: 177–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heusipp G, Young GM, Miller VL. HreP, an in vivo-expressed protease of Yersinia enterocolitica, is a new member of the family of subtilisin/kexin-like proteases. Journal of Bacteriology 2001; 183: 3556–3563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thisted Lambertz S, et al. Real-time PCR method for detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in food. Applied Environmental Microbiology 2008; 74: 6060–6067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Weynants V, et al. Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serogroup O:3 by a PCR method. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1996; 34: 1224–1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ortiz Martínez P, et al. Wide variety of bioserotypes of enteropathogenic Yersinia in tonsils of English pigs at slaughter. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2010; 139: 64–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wauters G, Kandolo K, Janssens M. Revised biogrouping scheme of Yersinia enterocolitica. Contributions to Microbiology and Immunology 1987; 9: 14–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bhagat N, Virdi JS. The enigma of Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1A. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 2011; 37: 25–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lanada E, et al. Prevalence of Yersinia species in goat flocks. Australian Veterinary Journal 2005; 83: 563–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Slee KJ, Button C. Enteritis in sheep and goats due to Yersinia enterocolitica infection. Australian Veterinary Journal 1990; 67: 396–398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wuthe HH, Aleksić S. Leporine and ovine infections due to Yersinia enterocolitica serovar 2a, 2b, 3:b,c biovar 5. Berliner Münchner Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 1997; 110: 176–177. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wuthe HH, Aleksić S. Yersinia enterocolitica serovar 1,2a,3 biovar 3 in chinchillas. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie 1992; 277: 403–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Infection are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES