Skip to main content
. 2022 May 31;27(2):857–871. doi: 10.1007/s11030-022-10459-9

Table 2.

Interpretation of molecular docking of the amentoflavone’s derivatives with control drug (camostat mesylate) and their interactions against the MPRO protein

Ligand–protein interaction Binding energy (kcal/mol) H-bond residues H-bond length (Å) No. of H-bonds Other bond residues
D1-MPRO − 8.9 Gly143 2.31 3 Pro168, Ser144, Glu166
Phe140 3.06
Thr190 2.27
D2-MPRO − 9.4 His163 3.02 2 Gly 143, Cys145, Glu166
Thr26 2.10
D3-MPRO − 9.7 His163 2.40 3 Asp187, Asn142, Cys145, Met165, Met 49, His41
Glu166 2.64
Thr26 2.23
D4-MPRO − 9.1 Glu166 2.94 1 Gly143, Cys145
D5-MPRO − 9.3 Glu166 3.03 1 Gly143, Cys145
D6-MPRO − 9.0 0 Gly143, Cys145, Glu166
D7-MPRO − 9.7 Asn142 2.62 2 Thr45, Gln189, Cys145, Glu166, His 41
His164 2.32
D8-MPRO − 9.3 Thr 26 2.21 1 Gly143, Met 165, Glu166, Cys 145
D9-MPRO − 8.8

Gln189

Phe140

2.59 2 Glu166, Met49, Cys145
2.08
D10-MPRO − 9.0 Asn142 2.97 2 Glu166, Phe140, Cys145, Met 165
Gly143 2.31
Camostat mesylate (references drug) − 7.9 Asp153 2.48 4 Ile106, Phe294
Asn151 2.84
Ile249 2.56
Ser158 2.72