Table 1.
Summary of articles discussing the microbiome and HPV gynecologic cancer
Author
|
Participants
|
Microbial Analysis
|
Key Bacterial Organisms
|
Comments
|
Studies on the Cervicovaginal Microbiome and CIN | ||||
Guijon et al26 | CIN positive (n = 106) Control (n = 79) | Culture, gram staining | Mycoplasma hominis | HPV, abnormal vaginal flora, and M. hominis, significantly associated with CIN. |
Piyathilake et al34 | CIN3 (n = 132) CIN2 (n = 208) CIN1 (n = 90) | V4 16S rRNA | Lactobacillus iners | α-and β-diversity was not significantly associated with disease status. L. iners abundance was associated with increased disease severity. |
Klein et al35 | LSIL (n = 72) HSIL (n = 50) Control (n = 23) | V4 16S rRNA | Mycoplasmatales, Pseudomonadales, Fusobacteria, Staphylococcus | Increased α-diversity was associated with HSIL and HPV. Brush samples from HSIL patients revealed unique associations with Mycoplasmatales, Pseudomonadales, and Staphylococcus. |
Studies on the Cervicovaginal Microbiome, CIN, and Cervical Cancer | ||||
Mitra et al33 | LSIL (n = 52) HSIL (n = 92) CC (n = 5) Control (n = 20) | V1-V2 16S rRNA | Lactobacillus spp., Lactobacillus crispatus, Sneathia sanguinegens | Lactobacillus depletion, high diversity and species richness was associated with increasing disease severity and high-risk HPV positivity. |
Mitra et al32 | CIN2 (n = 87) | V1-V2 16S rRNA | Lactobacillus spp., Megasphaera, Prevotella timonensis, Gardnerella vaginalis | Lactobacillus-dominant microbiome at baseline is more likely to have regression of CIN2 at 12 months. Lactobacillus spp. depletion and presence of specific anaerobic taxa including Megasphaera, Prevotella timonensis, and Gardnerella vaginalis are associated with CIN2 persistence and slower regression. |
Audirac-Chalifour et al37 | HPV− control (n = 10) HPV+ control (n = 10) SIL HPV+ (n = 4) CC HPV+ (n = 8) | V3-V4 16S rRNA | Lactobacillus iners, Sneathia spp., Fusobacterium spp. | Increased α-diversity in CC and SIL with unique β-diversities at every stage of CC. All four study groups were dominated by a single distinct population of bacteria: L. crispatus, L. iners, Sneathia spp., and Fusobacterium spp. were dominant in HPV-negative samples, HPV-positive samples, SIL samples, and CC samples, respectively. |
Łaniewski et al36 | Control (n = 51) LSIL (n = 12) HSIL (n = 27) CC (n = 10) | V4 16S rRNA | Lactobacillus spp., Sneathia spp. | Decreased abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and increased microbiome diversity was associated with increasing severity of cervical neoplasm and CC. |
Kwon et al45 | CIN (n = 17) CC (n = 12) Control (n = 18) | Whole-genome sequencing | Alkaliphilus, Pseudothermotoga, Wolbachia, Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus, Candidatus Endolissoclinum | Diversity was not significantly associated with disease status. CC and CIN were each significantly enriched with bacteria unique to the other disease status. |
Studies on the Gut (Fecal) Microbiome and Cervical Cancer | ||||
Wang et al50 | ICC (n = 8) Control (n = 5) | V4 16S rRNA | Proteobacteria, Parabacteroides, Escherichia-Shigella, Roseburia | Increased α-diversity (NS) and differing β-diversity of gut microbiome in CC versus control. Seven genera differentiated significantly in relative abundance between CC and controls. |
Sims et al51 | ICC (n = 42) Control (n = 46) | V4 16S rRNA | Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Dialister | Increased α-diversity and differing β-diversity in CC versus control. CC patients exhibited significantly enriched Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Dialister when compared to age, race, and BMI-matched controls. |
CC: cervical cancer; HSIL: high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; ICC: invasive cervical cancer; LSIL: low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; SIL: squamous intraepithelial lesion.