Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 3;65(2):94–103. doi: 10.1159/000519440

Table 5.

Safety and efficacy of TAF and TDF at 48 weeks

THF (n = 154) TAF (n = 46) Total (n = 200) p value
ΔCholesterol, mg/dL –10.00 (–28.00–8.00) 5.50 (–22.25–30.75) –8.50 (–26.00–12.00) 0.010*
AALP, IU/L –5.50 (–4.25–28.00) –11.00 (–20.00–8.00) –6.83 (–34.75–19.25) 0.744
ΔeGFR, mg/dL –3.35 (–16.13–10.70) 1.90 (–6.72–8.50) –0.60 (–12.50–10.38) 0.071
Complications of LC, n (%) 1 (0.7) 0 (0) 1 (0.7) 0.584
 Varices 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Variceal bleeding 1 (100) 0 (0) 1 (100)
 Ascites 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 SBP 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 HE 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
HBeAg seroconversion 12/80 (15.0%) 3/18 (16.7%) 15/98 (15.3%) 0.859
CVR 127/154 (82.5%) 35/46 (76.1%) 162/200 (81.0%) 0.333
ALT normalization 117/152 (77.0%) 36/46 (78.3%) 153/198 (77.3%) 0.855

TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LC, liver cirrhosis; SBP, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; HE, hepatic encephalopathy; CVR, complete viral response; ALT, alanine amino-transferase; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen. p < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.