Table 4.
Variable | Attitudea (M1) | Interpretationb (M2) | Intentionc (Y) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | p | β | p | β | p | |
Knowledged (X) | 0.173 | <.001 | 0.221 | <.001 | −0.008 | .792 |
Attitudea (M1) | 0.255 | <.001 | ||||
Interpretation (M2) | 0.416 | <.001 | ||||
Age | 0.041 | .214 | 0.150 | <.001 | 0.064 | .026 |
Gendere | −0.113 | .001 | −0.128 | <.001 | −0.066 | .020 |
Educationf | 0.019 | .569 | 0.002 | .961 | −0.021 | .450 |
Family experienceg | 0.127 | .001 | 0.035 | .353 | 0.003 | .918 |
Care experienceh | 0.052 | .179 | 0.026 | .491 | 0.029 | .386 |
R 2 = .0825 | R 2 = .1076 | R 2 = .3266 | ||||
F(6, 893) = 13.39 | F(6, 893) = 17.945 | F(8, 891) = 54.011 | ||||
p < .001 | p < .001 | p < .001 |
Notes: M = mediator variable; X = independent variable; Y = dependent variables.
aScore for attitude toward people with dementia.
bThe number of positive responses to interpreting the situation as one in which assistance is required (0–4).
c The number of positive responses to intending to perform helping behaviors (0–4);
dScore for dementia knowledge.
eMale = 1, female = 0.
fGraduation from junior high school = 1, graduation from high school = 2, graduation from junior or career college = 3, graduation from university = 4, graduation from graduate school = 5.
gExperience of having a family member with dementia (“yes” = 1, “no” = 0).
hExperience of providing nursing care for a family member with dementia (“yes” = 1, “no” = 0).