Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;6(3):igac023. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac023

Table 4.

Coefficients for the Mediation Model, With Intention (Y) as the Outcome (n = 900)

Variable Attitudea (M1) Interpretationb (M2) Intentionc (Y)
β p β p β p
Knowledged (X) 0.173 <.001 0.221 <.001 −0.008 .792
Attitudea (M1) 0.255 <.001
Interpretation (M2) 0.416 <.001
Age 0.041 .214 0.150 <.001 0.064 .026
Gendere −0.113 .001 −0.128 <.001 −0.066 .020
Educationf 0.019 .569 0.002 .961 −0.021 .450
Family experienceg 0.127 .001 0.035 .353 0.003 .918
Care experienceh 0.052 .179 0.026 .491 0.029 .386
R 2 = .0825 R 2 = .1076 R 2 = .3266
F(6, 893) = 13.39 F(6, 893) = 17.945 F(8, 891) = 54.011
p < .001 p < .001 p < .001

Notes: M = mediator variable; X = independent variable; Y = dependent variables.

aScore for attitude toward people with dementia.

bThe number of positive responses to interpreting the situation as one in which assistance is required (0–4).

c The number of positive responses to intending to perform helping behaviors (0–4);

dScore for dementia knowledge.

eMale = 1, female = 0.

fGraduation from junior high school = 1, graduation from high school = 2, graduation from junior or career college = 3, graduation from university = 4, graduation from graduate school = 5.

gExperience of having a family member with dementia (“yes” = 1, “no” = 0).

hExperience of providing nursing care for a family member with dementia (“yes” = 1, “no” = 0).