Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 23;39(3):373–380. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab157

Table 4.

Comparison of mean Primary Care Assessment Tool and EQ-VAS responses at baseline and follow-up between trial arms from the sample of 735 Australian EQuIP-GP trial participants (2018–2019).

PCAT sub-scale/EQ-VAS Baseline mean score (SE) Follow-up mean score (SE) Baseline mean score (SE) Follow-up mean score (SE) Modelled mean difference (95% CIa) Sig. P ICCb
Trial arm Intervention Intervention Control Control
Relational continuity 3.42 (0.053) 3.48 (0.054) 3.38 (0.052) 3.41 (0.052) −0.02 (−0.13, 0.09) 0.734 0.18
Accessibility 2.91 (0.052) 2.97 (0.053) 2.98 (0.051) 2.95 (0.051) −0.11 (−0.24, 0.02) 0.089 0.06
Coordination 3.38 (0.046) 3.41 (0.047) 3.43 (0.046) 3.37 (0.046) −0.08 (−0.22, 0.06) 0.277 0.03
Comprehensive care 2.74 (0.056) 2.79 (0.056) 2.74 (0.055) 2.81 (0.055) 0.04 (−0.06, 0.14) 0.450 0.07
EQ-VAS 72.32 (1.53) 74.33 (1.54) 72.02 (1.50) 74.04 (1.51) 0.02 (−2.38, 2.41) 0.990 0.05

confidence interval.

Intracluster correlation coefficient.