Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Abus. 2021 Jul 6;43(1):465–478. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1946893

Table 2.

Overdose Risk Profiles by Substance Use Behaviors in a Sample of Massachusetts Residents Who Use Drugs, 2017–2019.

Awareness of fentanyl in drug supply Total
Current cocaine
use – no opioid
use history
Current cocaine
use – opioid
use history
Current
opioid use
Current
cocaine and
opioid use
Test
statistic
p-Value
N = 465
N = 37
N = 35
N = 88
N = 305
N % N % N % N % N %
Fentanyl awareness
 No/Don’t know 15 3.2 6 16.2 1 2.9 3 3.4 5 1.6
 Yes 450 96.8 31 83.8 34 97.1 85 96.6 300 98.4 0.001
Know/Suspect fentanyl in drugs – past 12 months n = 460 n = 37 n = 34 n = 85 n = 304
 No/Don’t Know 110 23.9 35 94.6 20 58.8 17 20.0 38 12.5
 Yes 350 76.1 2 5.4 14 41.2 68 80.0 266 87.5 <.0001
Reason for knowing/Suspecting fentanyl in drugs n = 251 n = 2 n = 9 n = 47 n = 193
 Fentanyl test strip 7 2.8 0 0.0 0 0 1 2.1 6 3.1
 Overdosed quickly 19 7.6 0 0.0 0 0 3 6.4 16 8.3
 Someone else overdosed 12 4.8 0 0.0 1 11.1 3 6.4 8 4.1
 Bought online as fentanyl 2 0.8 0 0.0 1 11.1 0 0.0 1 0.5
 Dealer said so 55 21.9 0 0.0 2 22.2 9 19.1 44 22.8
 Feel, color, taste 180 71.7 1 50.0 7 77.8 29 61.7 143 74.1
 Another reason 49 19.5 1 50.0 2 22.2 13 27.7 33 17.1
  Tested positive for it during mandatory urine drug testing 20 8.0 0 0.0 1 50 4 30.8 15 7.8
  It is in everything/fentanyl saturation in local drug supply 20 8.0 1 100.0 1 50 3 23.1 15 100.0
  Word of mouth 5 2.0 0 0.0 0 0 3 23.1 2 13.3
  Another reason* 4 1.6 0 0.0 0 0 2 15.4 2 13.3
Looking to intentionally buy fentanyl n = 284 n = 2 n = 11 n = 50 n = 220
 Yes 75 26.4 0 0.0 2 18.2 15 30.0 58 26.4
 No 209 73.6 2 66.7 10 90.9 35 70.0 162 73.6 0.01
 Intended to buy…** n = 172 n = 2 n = 8 n = 22 n = 140
  Heroin 153 89.0 0 0.0 5 62.5 21 95.5 127 90.7
  Powdered cocaine 7 4.1 1 50.0 1 12.5 0 0.0 5 3.6
  Crack cocaine 5 2.9 0 0.0 0 0 1 4.5 4 2.9 0.003
  Something else 7 4.1 1 50.0 2 25 0 0.0 4 2.9
Know how to recognize an overdose
Number of overdose experiences
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
 Personal (n = 410): IQR: 4 3.61 8.6 0.42 0.9 1.66 2.61 3.79 8.7 4.22 9.4 2.66 (df = 3) 0.05
 Witnessed (n = 462): IQR: 13 12.92 20.4 10.41 23.5 10.4 17.25 9.43 16.2 14.55 21.4 1.87 (df = 3) 0.13
Ever witnessed an overdose N % N % N % N % N %
 No 47 10.2 8 21.6 2 5.7 8 9.1 29 9.6 0.14
 Yes 415 89.8 29 78.4 33 94.3 80 90.9 273 90.4
Ever overdosed 32.8 (df = 3)
 No 172 37.0 29 78.4 16 45.7 32 36.4 95 31.1
 Yes 293 63.0 8 21.6 19 54.3 56 63.6 210 68.9 <.0001
Suspect fentanyl involved in last overdose n = 236 n = 11 n = 13 n = 52 n = 163
 No 57 24.2 5 62.5 7 53.8 11 21.2 34 20.9
 Yes 179 75.8 3 37.5 6 46.2 41 78.8 129 79.1 0.004
Reason for suspecting fentanyl involved in last overdose n = 179 n = 3 n = 6 n = 41 n = 129
 Overdosed quickly 65 36.3 2 66.7 4 66.7 15 36.6 46 35.7
 Feel, color, taste 77 43.0 1 33.3 2 33.3 16 39.0 59 45.7
 Fentanyl test strip 2 1.1 0 0.0 0 0 1 2.4 1 0.8
 Someone else overdosed quickly 4 2.2 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 4 3.1
 Dealer said so 16 8.9 0 0.0 0 0 4 9.8 12 9.3
 Another reason 61 34.1 0 0.0 2 33.3 14 34.1 45 34.9
  Looking to buy fentanyl 4 2.2 0 0.0 0 0 1 7.1 3 6.7
  Tested positive for it during mandatory urine drug testing 14 7.8 0 0.0 0 0 6 42.9 8 17.8
  It is in everything/fentanyl saturation in local drug supply 11 6.1 0 0.0 0 0 3 21.4 8 17.8
  Word of mouth 3 1.7 0 0.0 0 0 1 7.1 2 4.4
  Small amount 6 3.4 0 0.0 1 50 0 0.0 5 11.1
  Another reason*** 23 12.8 0 0.0 1 50 3 21.4 19 42.2
Prepared to respond to an overdose
Naloxone awareness
 No 13 2.8 3 8.1 2 5.7 1 1.1 7 2.3
 Yes 452 97.2 34 91.9 33 94.3 87 98.9 298 97.7 0.08
Have personal naloxone kit
 No 174 37.4 28 75.7 19 54.3 39 44.3 88 28.9 38.7 (df = 3)
 Yes 291 62.6 9 24.3 16 45.7 49 55.7 217 71.1 <.0001
Trained in naloxone
 No 118 25.4 21 56.8 12 34.3 24 27.3 61 20.0 25.5 (df = 3)
 Yes 347 74.6 16 43.2 23 65.7 64 72.7 244 80.0 <.0001
Who trained to use naloxone n = 284 n = 15 n = 15 n = 57 n = 197
 Community organization 93 19.2 10 66.7 4 26.7 19 33.3 60 30.5
 In treatment 85 17.6 1 6.7 2 13.3 16 28.1 66 33.5
 Syringe services program 61 12.6 0 0.0 3 20 7 12.3 51 25.9
 Doctor, pharmacist or another provider 47 9.7 1 6.7 4 26.7 15 26.3 27 13.7
 Friend of family member 34 7.0 2 13.3 3 20 10 17.5 19 9.6
 Self-taught 19 3.9 1 6.7 1 6.7 5 8.8 12 6.1
 Jail 10 2.1 0 0.0 1 6.7 3 5.3 6 3.0
 Another method**** 22 4.5 2 13.3 1 6.7 6 10.5 13 6.6
911 Called – last witnessed overdose n = 460 n = 36 n = 33 n = 88 n = 303
 Don’t know 6 1.3 1 2.8 1 3.0 2 2.3 2 0.7
 No 129 28.0 1 2.8 8 24.2 24 27.3 96 31.7 0.003
 Yes 278 60.4 26 72.2 22 66.7 54 61.4 176 58.1
 Never witnessed an overdose 47 10.2 8 22.2 2 6.1 8 9.1 29 9.6
Naloxone administered – last witnessed overdose n = 417 n = 29 n = 33 n = 80 n = 275
 No/Don’t know 83 19.9 9 31.0 9 27.3 18 22.5 47 17.1 5.08 (df = 3)
 Yes 334 80.1 20 69.0 24 72.7 62 77.5 228 82.9 0.17
  Personally administered 141 42.3 6 30.0 11 45.8 19 30.6 105 46.1 5.78 (df = 3)
  Someone else administered 192 57.7 14 70.0 13 54.2 43 69.4 123 53.9 0.12

Note. Test-statistic is based on a chi-square test. Fisher’s exact tests were used when cell count was <5; only p-values are reported for Fisher’s Exact. DF: degrees of freedom. Bolded p-value = significant at p < 0.05.

*

Other reasons for suspected fentanyl in drug supply: amount; prior experience with dealer; saw other people’s response to the drug.

**

Not assessed in Lowell, Quincy, and Cape Cod.

***

Other reason for suspected fentanyl involvement in last overdose: not sure: used a lot; non-regular dealer; never overdosed on heroin before; shouldn’t have gone out; overdosed, must be fentanyl; didn’t buy from regular dealer; took many narcan kits to come back; watching reactions of other people who used.

****

Other ways that people were naloxone trained included: shelter; health department; trained at scene; job training; housing site; research study; police; not specified.