Table 4.
Geographical distribution of HIV-1 subtypes
| HIV-1 subtypes | P value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRF01_AE | CRF08_BC | CRF07_BC | B | C | URFs | ||
| Section 1: Dali, Nujiang, Lijiang, Diqing (n = 44) | 4 (9·1%) | 27 (61·4%) | 4 (9·1%) | 1 (2·3%) | 1 (2·3%) | 7 (15·9%) | <0·001* |
| Section 2: Baoshan, Dehong (n = 48) | 18 (37·5%)† | 4 (8·3%)† | 7 (14·6%) | 6 (12·5%) | 6 (12·5%) | 7 (14·6%) | |
| Section 3: Chuxiong, Yuxi (n = 30) | 1 (3·3%)‡ | 20 (66·7%)‡ | 8 (26·7%) | 1 (3·3%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Section 4: Lincang, Pu'er (n = 23) | 5 (21·7%) | 14 (60·9%)‡ | 2 (8·7%) | 0 | 0 | 2 (8·7%) | |
| Section 5: Kunming (n = 47) | 10 (21·3%) | 10 (21·3%)†§¶ | 23 (48·9%)†ce | 0 | 2 (4·3%) | 2 (4·3%) | |
| Section 6: Xishuangbanna (n = 9) | 6 (66·7%)†§ | 1 (11·1%) | 1 (11·1%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (11·1%) | |
| Section 7: Qujing, Zhaotong (n = 37) | 5 (13·5%)# | 23 (62·2%)‡∥ | 7 (18·9%) | 0 | 1 (2·7%) | 1 (2·7%) | |
| Section 8: Honghe, Wenshan (n = 52) | 8 (15·4%)# | 30 (57·7%)‡∥ | 9 (17·3%)f | 0 | 1 (1·9%) | 4 (7·7%) | |
*
Significant association by Fisher's exact test.
†
Significant difference in the corresponding proportion compared to section 1.
‡
Significant difference in the corresponding proportion compared to section 2.
§
Significant difference in the corresponding proportion compared to section 3.
¶
Significant difference in the corresponding proportion compared to section 4.
∥
Significant difference in the corresponding proportion compared to section 5.
#
Significant difference in the corresponding proportion compared to section 6.