Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 8;77(6):1694–1705. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac068

Table 2.

Omadacycline and combination regimen based γ-slopes and time-to-extinction in the HFS-MAC

Regimens Number of observations from HFS replicates B, initial bacterial load (95% CI) γ-Kill slope (95% CI) Time-to-extinction, months
(95% credible intervals)
Adjusted R2
R1 16 4.224 (3.704–4.744) 0.065 (0.046–0.083) None 0.991
R2 16 4.366 (3.954–4.778) −0.034 (−0.048 to −0.020) 9.20 (6.13–13.44) 0.984
R3 16 4.303 (3.821–4.785) −0.027 (−0.043 to −0.012) 12.72 (7.31–21.00) 0.978
R4 16 4.349 (3.882–4.817) −0.043 (−0.059 to −0.027) 7.01 (4.37–10.36) 0.978
R5 16 4.105 (3.635–4.576) −0.046 (−0.063 to −0.028) 6.45 (4.19–9.98) 0.975
R6 16 3.973 (3.438–4.508) −0.046 (−0.067 to −0.026) 6.22 (4.10–9.27) 0.966
R7 16 4.212 (3.756–4.668) −0.078 (−0.101 to −0.055) 2.83 (2.19–4.10) 0.978
R8 16 4.401 (3.939–4.862) −0.114 (−0.141 to −0.087) 2.57 (2.10–3.05) 0.976
R9 (SOC) 16 4.689 (4.345–5.032) −0.114 (−0.133 to −0.094) 2.60 (2.30–2.96) 0.988
R10 (SOC + omadacycline) 16 4.472 (4.006–4.939) −0.091 (−0.115 to −0.068) 3.28 (2.64–4.37) 0.977

r, the growth rate, was used instead of γ-kill slopes for the untreated control arm.