Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 10;13(3):846–856. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac025

TABLE 3.

Overview of existing GSRS mean Likert-scores with kiwifruit interventions1

Total GSRS2 Reflux Abdominal pain Indigestion
First author (ref) Group (n) Results reported as Mean [95% CI] P or Z value Mean [95% CI] P Mean [95% CI] P Mean [95% CI] P
Kindleysides (46)3 FC (32) Difference4 –0.3 0.0204  —
Drummond (16) Controls (63) Difference –0.08 [–0.20, 0.05] 0.2186 –0.05 [–0.22, 0.13] 0.5872 –0.02 [–0.18, 0.14] 0.7738 –0.16 [–0.30, –0.02] 0.0277
FC (60) Difference –0.22 [–0.32, –0.12] ≤0.0001 –0.17 [–0.34, 0.00] 0.0509 –0.07 [–0.29, 0.15] 0.5406 –0.22 [–0.39, –0.04] 0.0173
IBS-C (61) Difference –0.36 [–0.52, –0.21] ≤0.0001 –0.18 [–0.32, –0.04] 0.0127 –0.30 [–0.55, –0.04] 0.0237 –0.40 [–0.64, –0.16] 0.0016
FC+IBS-C (121) Difference –0.30 [–0.40, –0.20] ≤0.0001 –0.18 [–0.29, –0.07] 0.0015 –0.19 [–0.36, –0.02] 0.0267 –0.31 [–0.46, –0.16] ≤0.0001
Eady (23) Controls (20) Baseline 1.228  — 1.13 ± 0.23  — 1.25 ± 0.24  — 1.37 ± 0.34  —
Kiwifruit flesh 1.170  — 1.13 ± 0.23  — 1.11 ± 0.19  — 1.36 ± 0.41
Difference4 –0.058 ± 0.28  — 0.00 ± 0.23  — –0.14 ± 0.22  — –0.01 ± 0.38  —
Kiwifruit flesh + skin 1.226  — 1.16 ± 0.34  — 1.28 ± 0.39  — 1.43 ± 0.49  —
Difference3,4 –0.002  — 0.03  — 0.03  — 0.06  —
IBS-C (20) Baseline 2.138  — 1.55 ± 0.91  — 2.05 ± 0.89  — 2.48 ± 1.11  —
Kiwifruit flesh 1.786  — 1.34 ± 0.57  — 1.67 ± 0.95  — 2.10 ± 1.26  —
Difference4 –0.35 ± 1.07  — –0.21 ± 0.76  — –0.38 ± 0.92 0.036 c.t.t –0.38 ± 1.19  —
Kiwifruit flesh + skin 2.042  — 1.56 ± 0.91  — 2.02 ± 1.12  — 2.44 ± 1.28  —
Difference3,4 –0.096  — 0.01  — –0.03  — –0.04  —
Eady (17) FC+IBS-C (32) Difference –0.378 ± 0.97  — –0.08 ± 0.67  — –0.31 ± 0.66 ≤0.05 –0.67 ± 0.88 0.002
Bayer (18) Controls (32) Difference 0.028  — –0.05 [–0.27, 0.17]  — 0.03 [–0.28, 0.34]  — –0.02 [ –0.25, 0.20]  —
FC (11) Difference –0.402  — –0.08 [–0.43, 0.27]  — –0.31 [–0.80, 0.19]  — –0.54 [–0.90, –0.18] 0.008 c.t.b
IBS-C (13) Difference –0.106  — –0.41 [–0.77, –0.04]  — –0.09 [–0.61, 0.43]  — –0.27 [–0.65, 0.10] 0.008 c.t.b
FC+IBS-C (24) Difference –0.272 –0.24 [–0.49, 0.01]  — –0.20 [–0.56, 0.15]  — –0.41 [–0.67, –0.15] 0.008 c.t.b
Pooled Controls (115) –0.08 [–0.10, –0.05] –0.02 [–0.10, 0.06]  — –0.09 [–0.18, 0.01]  — –0.08 [–0.18, 0.02]  —
FC+IBS-C (197) –0.32 [–0.46, –0.17] –0.13 [–0.31, 0.05]  — –0.93 [–1.19, –0.68] –0.41 [–0.50, –0.26]
Mean difference –0.24 [–0.38, –0.10] –3.255 –0.11 [–0.31, 0.08] –1.135 –0.85 [–1.12, –0.57] –6.125 –0.33 [–0.52, –0.15] –3.495
1

Values are means ± SDs or means [95% CIs]. Estimation for changes in GSRS domains and totals were extracted from the reports. Pooled estimates were derived from these aggregate summaries using a random-effects model for each of the interventions and control groups. Resulting estimates were then compared using a Z test and 95% CI. c.t.b., compared with baseline value; c.t.t., compared with treatment value; FC, functional constipation; GSRS, Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale; IBS-C, irritable bowel syndrome with constipation.

2

Score based on 15 items using Likert scores, covering 5 domains. Domain scores can range from 1 to 7, with higher scores representing higher levels of discomfort.

3

Not included in pooled results.

4

Difference not presented in original manuscript; calculated based on published results.

5

Z value.