Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 2;7(5):504–517. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.10.018

Table 2.

Summary of Proposed Rapid Therapy Initiation Models

Details Timeline Advantages Disadvantages
Packer and McMurray27 Initiate BB and SGLT2i upfront, followed by ARNI then MRA Four weeks to achieve initiation of GDMT Focus on tolerability without initiating multiple medications that can induce hypotension or acute kidney injury Coverage of therapies such as SGLT2i and ARNI may be predicated on being symptomatic on baseline HF therapies such as an ACE inhibitor, MRA, and BB
Miller et al59 Cluster phenotype-based approach; if volume overloaded, add SGLT2i; if hypertensive add ARNI/MRA; if higher heart rate, add and titrate BB and SNI 3-6 weeks of therapy initiation followed by dose titration Based on patient clinical characteristics that may enhance tolerability Needs multiple patient visits or touchpoints; drug coverage may predicate a sequential approach to therapy initiation
Greene et al60 Rapid initiation of low doses of all categories of foundational quadruple therapy within 1 week Dose titration across 1 month Enables rapid initiation of GDMT upfront, which may optimize clinical benefit If a patient has a side effect, unclear which therapy is the culprit; drug coverage may predicate a sequential approach to therapy initiation

SNI = sinus node inhibitor; other abbreviations as in Table 1.