Skip to main content
. 2022 May 17;13:859931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859931

TABLE 3.

Sex differences in waist-hip ratio (WHR) and other measures of fat distribution.

Source Country n Ages Measure Female Male f/m d
Wietlisbach et al. (2013) 27 countries 40,480 35–64 WHR 0.81 0.92 0.88
Tichet et al. (1993) France 18,393 17–60 WHR 0.79 ± 0.07 0.91 ± 0.07 0.87 1.73
*NHANES III US 8,080 15–39 WHR 0.84 ± 0.07 0.90 ± 0.07 0.93 0.85
Qiong et al. (2017) China 2,286 20–29 WHR 0.79 ± 0.06 0.84 ± 0.06 0.94 0.83
Bacopoulou et al. (2015) Greece 1,610 12–17 WHR 0.73 ± 0.06 0.79 ± 0.06 0.92 1.00
Taylor et al. (2010) New Zealand 206 20–26 WHR 0.78 ± 0.08 0.85 ± 0.07 0.92 1.00
Fredriks et al. (2005) Dutch 690 18 WHR 0.75 ± 0.07 0.82 ± 0.06 0.91 1.08
Ahmad et al. (2016) Malaysia 669 18 + WHR 0.86 ± 0.08 0.90 ± 0.08 0.96 0,50
Ley et al. (1992) UK DEXA 234 31–55 Waist fat 12.0 ± 1.9 18.1 ± 2.9 0.66 2.54
Hip fat 19.4 ± 2.3 18.1 ± 1.8 1.07 0.65
Ratio 0.62 1.00
*NHANES 99-06 US DEXA 9,359 15–49 Leg/trunk 1.02 ± 0.31 0.83 ± 0.24 1.23 0.63
*NHANES III US skinfolds 16,539 >17 Triceps 23.7 ± 8.7 12.6 ± 6.2 1.88 1.48
mm Subscap. 22.6 ± 9.5 19.0 ± 7.8 1.19 1.19
Suprailiac 21.9 ± 10.3 20.9 ± 10.0 1.05 0.09
Thigh 28.4 ± 9.2 13.3 ± 7.0 2.12 1.87

*New analyses (see section “Materials and Methods”).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure