Table 6.
Quantitative comparison of instance segmentation performances of six networks including PSegNet.
| Methods | Tobacco leaf | Tomato leaf | Sorghum leaf | Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mPrec (%) | ASIS | 78.54 | 80.21 | 79.04 | 79.26 |
| PlantNet | 87.74 | 85.50 | 79.39 | 84.21 | |
| PSegNet (ours) | 87.80 | 89.92 | 86.68 | 88.13 | |
|
| |||||
| mRec (%) | ASIS | 56.27 | 64.84 | 72.08 | 64.40 |
| PlantNet | 69.36 | 76.63 | 81.83 | 75.94 | |
| PSegNet (ours) | 77.09 | 78.62 | 82.13 | 79.28 | |
|
| |||||
| mCov (%) | ASIS | 62.88 | 76.61 | 74.26 | 71.25 |
| PlantNet | 71.98 | 83.34 | 82.63 | 79.32 | |
| PSegNet (ours) | 80.88 | 84.89 | 84.27 | 83.35 | |
|
| |||||
| mWCov (%) | ASIS | 73.95 | 82.73 | 77.31 | 78.00 |
| PlantNet | 84.83 | 89.48 | 85.68 | 86.66 | |
| PSegNet (ours) | 90.72 | 90.45 | 87.46 | 89.54 | |
The best values are in boldface.