Skip to main content
. 2022 May 18;13:855858. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.855858

Table 1.

Substrate matric potential (ψm) at eight substrate volumetric water content treatments (θt) recorded on 11 January 2021.

θt (m3·m−3) ψmz (MPa)
0.40 −0.08 ay
0.35 −0.03 a
0.30 −0.04 a
0.25 −0.23 ab
0.20 −0.26 ab
0.15 −0.56 bc
0.10 −0.51 b
0.05 −0.89 c
Linear NSx
Quadratic *
Cubic ****
z

ψm was calculated from measurements of a handheld soil moisture sensor (Hydro Sense; Campbell Scientific) using a substrate-specific water retention curve estimated using the van Genuchten equation (van Genuchten, 1980), of which the residual water content is 0, the saturated water content is 0.74 m3·m−3, the inverse of the air entry suction is 771.43 MPa−1, and the dimensionless pore-size distribution is 1.33.

y

Means with same lowercase letters are not significantly different among treatments by Tukey–Kramer method with a significance level specified at 0.05.

x

NS, *, **** Nonsignificant, significant at p ≤ 0.05 or 0.0001, respectively.