Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268382

Table 3. Sensitivity analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of canine detection, as compared to several references.

Reference standard Total, n Positive samples, n Sensitivity (95% CI*) Specificity (95% CI)
NPS RT-PCR ≥ 2 targets 335 108 97% (92 to 99) 91% (86 to 94)
 Symptoms 143 77 96% (89 to 99) 82% (70 to 90)
 No symptoms 192 31 100% (89 to 100) 94% (90 to 97)
NPS RT-PCR ≥ 1 target and Ct value < 32 335 107 97% (92 to 99) 90% (86 to 94)
 Symptoms 143 76 96% (89 to 99) 81% (69 to 89)
 No symptoms 192 31 100% (89 to 100) 94% (90 to 97)
Saliva RT-PCR ≥ 1 target 320 80 90% (81 to 96) 81% (75 to 86)
 Symptoms 136 53 96% (87 to 100) 65% (54 to 75)
 No symptoms 184 27 78% (58 to 91) 89% (83 to 94)
NPS RT-PCR ≥ 1 target or 327 116 92% (86 to 96) 91% (87 to 95)
Saliva RT-PCR ≥ 1 target
 Symptoms 142 79 96% (89 to 99) 84% (73 to 92)
 No symptoms 185 37 84% (68 to 94) 95% (90 to 98)
NPS RT-PCR ≥ 1 target or 327 112 95% (89 to 98) 91% (87 to 95)
Saliva RT-PCR ≥ 1 target and Ct value < 32
 Symptoms 142 78 96% (89 to 99) 83% (71 to 91)
 No symptoms 185 34 91% (76 to 98) 95% (90 to 98)
NPS antigen 234 80 95% (88 to 99) 83% (76 to 89)
 Symptoms 123 60 97% (88 to 100) 71% (59 to 82)
 No symptoms 111 20 90% (68 to 99) 91% (83 to 96)

*95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.