Table 1.
ROI 1 | ROI 7 | ROI 93 | ROI 103 | Resp. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.05–0.15 Hz | |||||
ROI 7 | 79.02 | ||||
ROI 93 | 23.69 | 6.12 | |||
ROI 103 | 2.93 | 0.44 | 7.07 | ||
Resp. | 99.96 | 100.00 | 99.99 | 99.95 | |
RRI | 83.93 | 72.81 | 96.02 | 99.25 | 0.36 |
0.1–0.2 Hz | |||||
ROI 7 | 61.23 | ||||
ROI 93 | 10.01 | 1.50 | |||
ROI 103 | 0.61 | 0.51 | 2.83 | ||
Resp. | 89.74 | 54.62 | 96.33 | 99.14 | |
RRI | 18.04 | 5.99 | 16.12 | 91.82 | 14.33 |
The numbers show percentiles of the distributions obtained by the bootstrap approach1 for low/no anxiety group in the LF band (upper part) and the IMF band (lower part). Significant differences (marked by bold numbers) are those, which exceed the range of 95% of the random distribution of the differences obtained by the bootstrap method. Depending on the sign of the differences between in- and outflows, they are located below 2.5 and above 97.5 percentile.