Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 1;13:3052. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30637-5

Table 1.

Factors associated with putative clonal transmission of CPE.

Variable Clonal-transmission pairs (N = 1451)(%) Control pairs (N = 1451)(%) Clonal-transmission pairsa (weighted %) Control pairsa (weighted %) Univariable analysisb Multivariable analysisb
OR (95%CI) P-value aOR (95%CI) P-value
Hospital or ward contact
 No hospital nor ward contact 288 (19.9) 763 (52.6) 18.5% 44.9% ref ref
 Direct ward contact 134 (9.2) 5 (0.3) 14.5% 0.5% 7.55 (5.01–11.4) <0.0001 6.22 (3.89–9.95) <0.0001
 Indirect ward contact 255 (17.6) 172 (11.9) 18.1% 12.6% 3.11 (2.08–4.66) <0.0001 2.90 (1.89–4.45) <0.0001
 Direct hospital contact (No ward contact) 385 (26.5) 100 (6.9) 29.0% 9.1% 4.99 (3.42–7.29) <0.0001 4.66 (3.20–6.79) <0.0001
 Indirect hospital contact (No ward contact) 389 (26.8) 411 (28.3) 19.9% 32.9% 1.65 (1.07–2.53) 0.022 1.62 (1.07–2.47) 0.023
Discipline contact
 No contact 1115 (76.8) 1261 (86.9) 74.9% 84.9% ref ref
 Direct contact 127 (8.8) 20 (1.4) 12.4% 2.0% 2.72 (1.91–3.87) <0.0001 1.19 (0.80–1.77) 0.38
 Indirect contact 209 (14.4) 170 (11.7) 12.7% 13.2% 1.10 (0.76–1.60) 0.61 0.97 (0.64–1.45) 0.87
Procedure contact
 No contact 1438 (99.1) 1442 (99.4) 99.6% 99.0% ref ref
 Direct contact 0 0 0.0% 0.0%
 Indirect contact 13 (0.9) 9 (0.6) 0.4% 1.0% 0.49 (0.06–3.93) 0.50
Bacterial species
 Escherichia coli 283 (19.5) 593 (40.9) 18.1% 39.4% ref ref
 Klebsiella pneumoniae 819 (56.4) 395 (27.2) 57.5% 30.4% 3.05 (2.04–4.55) <0.0001 3.13 (2.14–4.58) <0.0001
 Enterobacter spp 308 (21.2) 318 (21.9) 17.9% 19.6% 1.75 (1.14–2.71) 0.011 2.29 (1.46–3.61) 0.0003
 Others 41 (2.8) 145 (10.0) 6.5% 10.5% 1.31 (0.65–2.65) 0.45 1.25 (0.59–2.64) 0.56
Genotypes
 blaKPC 443 (30.5) 591 (40.7) 33.3% 42.0% ref ref
 blaNDM 664 (45.8) 599 (41.3) 48.0% 39.7% 1.39 (1.01–1.90) 0.042 1.52 (1.04–2.22) 0.031
 blaOXA-type 321 (22.1) 153 (10.5) 14.7% 10.5% 1.55 (1.01–2.38) 0.043 1.81 (1.13–2.91) 0.014
 Others 23 (1.6) 108 (7.4) 4.0% 7.8% 0.69 (0.31–1.56) 0.38 0.77 (0.34–1.78) 0.55
Community contactc
 No contact 1450 (100.0) 1451 (100.0)
 Same household 0 0
 Same zipcode 1 (0.0) 0

OR Odds-ratio, aOR Adjusted odds-ratio, Ref Reference, Not applicable

aTo correct for potential bias from clustering, the prevalence of epidemiologic risk factors were inversely-weighted by a factor of one over the number of case-control pairs with identical source patient and by reducing the sample size to derive standard errors concomitantly.

bUnivariable and multivariable analyses were conducted based on the weighted percentages using conditional logistic regression on matched case-control pairs. The Wald chi-square test was performed for all the risk factors with an α level of 0.05 (two-sided). No adjustment was made for multiple comparisons.

cCommunity contact was excluded from univariable and multivariable analyses as the frequency of exposure was too low.