TABLE 4.
Method of analysis | Anchor | Change in K-BILD total score | Thresholds | |
Anchor-based methods | Threshold for stabilisation | |||
Mean change# | Stable | Minimal-to-moderate decline | ||
Global QoL¶ | 0.6 | –3.9 | –1.7§ | |
Global physical health¶ | 0.5 | –3.3 | –1.4§ | |
Stable | Minimal decline | |||
Global QoL¶ | 0.6 | –3.7 | –1.6§ | |
Global physical health¶ | 0.5 | –2.6 | –1.1§ | |
eCDF analysis | Stable | Minimal-to-moderate decline | ||
Global QoL+ | 0.7 | –3.3 | –1.3§ | |
Global physical health+ | 0.0 | –3.8 | –1.9§ | |
Youden index cut-point | ||||
Global QoL | –1.5 | |||
Global physical health | –1.5 | |||
Distribution-based method | Threshold for deterioration | |||
sem | –3.2 | |||
0.2 sd | –2.5 | |||
0.5 sd | –6.3 |
QoL: quality of life; eCDF: empirical cumulative distribution function. #: threshold analyses were conducted to determine the meaningful cut-point in K-BILD mean change score that lies half-way between the group means for stable patients (no change) and patients with minimal-to-moderate decline (−1 to −2 units) according to the anchor categories. Post hoc analyses using the mean change method were also conducted based on the stable patients (no change) and in patients with minimal decline (−1 unit). ¶: mean. +: median. §: half-way cut-point=(stable group+declinegroup)/2.