Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;18:211. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03269-6

Table 2.

Concordance between culture and sequencing results for each sample

Culture Result Number of Sequencing Reads Concordance between Methods
Sample MH PM HS MB MH PM HS MB MH PM HS MB
1  +  8 MATCH MATCH MATCH MATCH
2  +  6 1 2 10 Seq Seq Seq MATCH
3 Few 9 5 MATCH MATCH MATCH Seq
4 7 MATCH Seq MATCH MATCH
5 1 +   +  49 11 344 MATCH MATCH Seq MATCH
6 2 +  80 4,085 16 1 Seq MATCH Seq Seq
7 1 +   +  1,436 3 1 MATCH MATCH Seq MATCH
8 1 +   +  660 4 MATCH MATCH MATCH MATCH
9 4 +   +  89 14,198 10 8 Seq MATCH Seq MATCH
10 1 +   +  55 4 MATCH MATCH MATCH MATCH
11 1 +   +  209 1 MATCH MATCH Seq Cult
12 3 +   +  24 3,582 593 Seq MATCH Seq Cult
13  +  3 255 Seq Seq MATCH Cult
14 1 +   +  33 MATCH MATCH MATCH Cult
15 MATCH MATCH MATCH MATCH
16 2 MATCH Seq MATCH MATCH
17 1 +  324 3 48 MATCH Seq Seq MATCH
18 2 +  813 MATCH MATCH MATCH MATCH
19 4 +  1 5,739 1 6 Seq MATCH Seq Seq
20 1 +  1,339 1 MATCH MATCH Seq MATCH
21 34 520 1 Seq Seq Seq MATCH
22 65 67 Seq Seq MATCH MATCH
23 1 +  381 2,306 4 Seq MATCH MATCH Seq
24 1 +  1 +  7,926 10,712 9 15 MATCH MATCH Seq Seq
25 1 +   +  27 1,222 5 Seq MATCH MATCH MATCH

The columns under “culture result” indicate the semiquantitative abundance of each recovered isolate (MH Mannheimia haemolytica, PMPasteurella multocida, HSHistophilus somni, MBMycoplasma bovis). The columns under “Number of sequencing reads” indicate the number of metagenomic sequencing reads that were classified as each of the four target pathogens, regardless of length. The columns under “concordance between methods” indicates whether the two approaches yielded the same answer (“MATCH”), Sequencing detected the organism when culture did not (‘Seq”), or culture detected the organism when sequencing did not (“Cult”)