Table 2.
Status | VO2 rest | RER rest | E rest | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unfit noD | 0.298 ± 0.021 | 0.843 ± 0.022 | 100.327 ± 7.352 | |
Unfit D | 0.335 ± 0.016 | 0.892 ± 0.010 | 114.205 ± 4.485 | |
Fit noD | 0.499 ± 0.036 | 0.828 ± 0.038 | 167.401 ± 13.347 | |
Fit D | 0.403 ± 0.023 | 0.921 ± 0.025 | 138.482 ± 8.453 | |
Fitness | p | <0.001 | 0.797 | <0.001 |
h2 | 0.3883 | 0.002 | 0.3741 | |
Genotype | p | 0.279 | 0.009 | 0.426 |
h2 | 0.029 | 0.158 | 0.016 | |
Fitness × genotype | p | 0.016 | 0.4 | 0.027 |
h2 | 0.136 | 0.018 | 0.116 | |
NoD fit vs. unfit | <0.001 | 0.741 | <0.001 | |
D fit vs. unfit | <0.001 | 0.237 | 0.008 | |
Unfit noD vs. D | 0.208 | 0.094 | 0.186 | |
Fit noD vs. D | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.071 |
Effects, which are underlined in bold, were deemed significant. ANOVA with post-hoc test of least significant difference was performed. N = 44. Definitions are introduced in the list of abbreviations.